Fangjian Guo1, Di He, Wei Zhang, R Grace Walton. 1. Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35205, USA. guofangjian@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to quantify the trends in blood pressure (BP), and the prevalence, awareness, management, and control of hypertension in U.S. adults (≥20 years of age) from 1999 to 2010, and to assess the efficacy of current clinical measures in diagnosing and adequately treating hypertensive patients. BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a major independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke. Recent data indicate a decreasing trend in hypertension prevalence, along with improvements in hypertension awareness, management, and control. METHODS: The study used regression models to assess the trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, management, and control from 1999 to 2010 among 28,995 male and female adults with BP measurements from a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized U.S. population (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] 1999 to 2010), with special attention given to 5,764 participants in NHANES 2009 to 2010. RESULTS: In 2009 to 2010, the prevalence of hypertension was 30.5% among men and 28.5% among women. The hypertension awareness rate was 69.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.0% to 77.4%) among men and 80.7% (95% CI: 74.5% to 86.8%) among women. The hypertension control rate was 40.3% (95% CI: 33.7% to 46.9%) for men and 56.3% (95% CI: 49.2% to 63.3%) for women. From 1999 to 2010, the prevalence of hypertension remained stable. Although hypertension awareness, management, and control improved, the overall rates remained poor (74.0% for awareness, 71.6% for management, 46.5% for control, and 64.4% for control in management); worse still, no improvement was shown from 2007 to 2010. CONCLUSIONS: From 1999 to 2010, prevalence of hypertension remained stable. Hypertension awareness, management, and control were improved, but remained poor; nevertheless, there has been no improvement since 2007.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to quantify the trends in blood pressure (BP), and the prevalence, awareness, management, and control of hypertension in U.S. adults (≥20 years of age) from 1999 to 2010, and to assess the efficacy of current clinical measures in diagnosing and adequately treating hypertensivepatients. BACKGROUND:Hypertension is a major independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke. Recent data indicate a decreasing trend in hypertension prevalence, along with improvements in hypertension awareness, management, and control. METHODS: The study used regression models to assess the trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, management, and control from 1999 to 2010 among 28,995 male and female adults with BP measurements from a nationally representative sample of the noninstitutionalized U.S. population (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] 1999 to 2010), with special attention given to 5,764 participants in NHANES 2009 to 2010. RESULTS: In 2009 to 2010, the prevalence of hypertension was 30.5% among men and 28.5% among women. The hypertension awareness rate was 69.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.0% to 77.4%) among men and 80.7% (95% CI: 74.5% to 86.8%) among women. The hypertension control rate was 40.3% (95% CI: 33.7% to 46.9%) for men and 56.3% (95% CI: 49.2% to 63.3%) for women. From 1999 to 2010, the prevalence of hypertension remained stable. Although hypertension awareness, management, and control improved, the overall rates remained poor (74.0% for awareness, 71.6% for management, 46.5% for control, and 64.4% for control in management); worse still, no improvement was shown from 2007 to 2010. CONCLUSIONS: From 1999 to 2010, prevalence of hypertension remained stable. Hypertension awareness, management, and control were improved, but remained poor; nevertheless, there has been no improvement since 2007.
Authors: Eun Ji Kim; Taekyu Kim; Joseph Conigliaro; Jane M Liebschutz; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Amresh D Hanchate Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: C L Gregson; E M Dennison; J E Compston; S Adami; J D Adachi; F A Anderson; S Boonen; R Chapurlat; A Díez-Pérez; S L Greenspan; F H Hooven; A Z LaCroix; J W Nieves; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; C Roux; K G Saag; S Silverman; E S Siris; N B Watts; A Wyman; C Cooper Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Maureen A Murtaugh; Jeannette M Beasley; Lawrence J Appel; Patricia M Guenther; Molly McFadden; Tom Greene; Janet A Tooze Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 10.190