PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present a novel medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction technique and investigate the clinical outcomes of this surgical procedure. METHODS: From July 2006 to June 2009, 56 patients with medial instability of the knee were treated with MCL reconstruction and followed up for 33 months on average. These patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury was present: 27 patients had isolated MCL injury, whereas 29 patients had combined MCL-ACL injury. All patients underwent reconstruction of the MCL with triangular double-bundle allograft, and we evaluated International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI), and excessive knee medial opening (EKMO) both preoperatively and at follow-up. RESULTS: EKMO was significantly reduced to 2.9 mm at follow-up compared with 10.1 mm preoperatively. The incidence of AMRI was reduced to 9.4% (5 patients) compared with 67.9% (36 patients) preoperatively. Of the patients, 58.9% (33 patients) had a grade A IKDC subjective score and 35.7% (20 patients) had a grade B IKDC subjective score. Most patients had normal or nearly normal range of motion of the knee joint, whereas 4 patients (7.1%) lost more than 6° of range of motion in extension and 2 (3.6%) lost more than 25° in flexion. In 47 patients (83.9%) the symptoms were graded as normal or nearly normal according to IKDC symptom scores. No significant differences in IKDC subjective score, IKDC symptom score, flexion deficit score, AMRI, and EKMO were found between the isolated MCL injury group and the MCL-ACL injury group; however, a significant difference was found in knee extension deficit between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented a new technique for reconstruction of the MCL with a triangular shape. This technique improved both valgus and rotational stability at short-term outcome. The clinical outcomes using IKDC evaluation indicate that no major difference exists in isolated MCL injury and combined MCL-ACL injury treated with this new technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present a novel medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction technique and investigate the clinical outcomes of this surgical procedure. METHODS: From July 2006 to June 2009, 56 patients with medial instability of the knee were treated with MCL reconstruction and followed up for 33 months on average. These patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury was present: 27 patients had isolated MCL injury, whereas 29 patients had combined MCL-ACL injury. All patients underwent reconstruction of the MCL with triangular double-bundle allograft, and we evaluated International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI), and excessive knee medial opening (EKMO) both preoperatively and at follow-up. RESULTS: EKMO was significantly reduced to 2.9 mm at follow-up compared with 10.1 mm preoperatively. The incidence of AMRI was reduced to 9.4% (5 patients) compared with 67.9% (36 patients) preoperatively. Of the patients, 58.9% (33 patients) had a grade A IKDC subjective score and 35.7% (20 patients) had a grade B IKDC subjective score. Most patients had normal or nearly normal range of motion of the knee joint, whereas 4 patients (7.1%) lost more than 6° of range of motion in extension and 2 (3.6%) lost more than 25° in flexion. In 47 patients (83.9%) the symptoms were graded as normal or nearly normal according to IKDC symptom scores. No significant differences in IKDC subjective score, IKDC symptom score, flexion deficit score, AMRI, and EKMO were found between the isolated MCL injury group and the MCL-ACL injury group; however, a significant difference was found in knee extension deficit between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented a new technique for reconstruction of the MCL with a triangular shape. This technique improved both valgus and rotational stability at short-term outcome. The clinical outcomes using IKDC evaluation indicate that no major difference exists in isolated MCL injury and combined MCL-ACL injury treated with this new technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.