Literature DB >> 22795867

Women's satisfaction with antenatal care: comparing women in Sweden and Australia.

Ingegerd Hildingsson1, Helen Haines, Maddalena Cross, Julie F Pallant, Christine Rubertsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Satisfaction with antenatal care could differ depending on the organisation and the context of care. AIM: To compare antenatal care in Australia and Sweden, to identify deficiencies in the content of antenatal care and what aspects contributed most in dissatisfaction with antenatal care.
METHODS: A longitudinal survey of 123 Australian and 386 Swedish women recruited during one year in regional hospitals in Sweden and Australia. Data collected by three questionnaires.
RESULTS: Women in Australia had more antenatal visits, less continuity of midwife caregiver but were more satisfied with antenatal education and the emotional aspects of antenatal care. Although the overall satisfaction was high, deficiencies were found in more than half of the studied variables in the content of care. Women in Sweden were more dissatisfied with information about labour and birth (OR 3.1; 1.8-5.3) and information about the time following birth (OR 3.8; 2.2-6.3), but more satisfied with the involvement of the father (OR 0.3; 0.2-0.6). Factors that contributed most to dissatisfaction with antenatal care overall were deficiency in information about pregnancy related issues (OR 3.4; 1.3-8.7) and not being taken seriously by the midwife (OR 4.1; 1.6-10.1).
CONCLUSION: Satisfaction with antenatal care was high in both groups of women. Australian women were more satisfied than the Swedish women with the emotional aspects of care. Deficiencies were found in more than half of the variables measured relating to the specific aspects of care. Lack of information and not being treated seriously were important factors for not being satisfied.
Copyright © 2012 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22795867     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  8 in total

Review 1.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

2.  Maternal Satisfaction with Antenatal Care and Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Hossana Town.

Authors:  Dagmawit Birhanu Kebede; Yeshitila Belay Belachew; Desta Workneh Selbana; Admasu Belay Gizaw
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2020-07-28

3.  Late registration for antenatal care by pregnant women with previous history of caesarean section.

Authors:  Mareko Ramotsababa; Vincent Setlhare
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2021-05-26

4.  Expectations and satisfaction with antenatal care among pregnant women with a focus on vulnerable groups: a descriptive study in Ghent.

Authors:  Anna Galle; An-Sofie Van Parys; Kristien Roelens; Ines Keygnaert
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Cultural differences in postnatal quality of life among German-speaking women - a prospective survey in two countries.

Authors:  Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin; Edwin van Teijlingen; Mechthild M Gross
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Antenatal Care Utilisation and Content between Low-Risk and High-Risk Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Ping Ling Yeoh; Klaus Hornetz; Maznah Dahlui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Being in limbo: Women's lived experiences of pregnancy at 41 weeks of gestation and beyond - A phenomenological study.

Authors:  Anna Wessberg; Ingela Lundgren; Helen Elden
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  The timing and quality of antenatal care received by women attending a primary care centre in Iquitos, Peru: A facility exit survey.

Authors:  Sara Jabeen Wynne; Rui Duarte; Gilles de Wildt; Graciela Meza; Abi Merriel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.