Literature DB >> 22795697

Diversification of a food-mimicking male ornament via sensory drive.

Niclas Kolm1, Mirjam Amcoff, Richard P Mann, Göran Arnqvist.   

Abstract

The evolutionary divergence of sexual signals is often important during the formation of new animal species, but our understanding of the origin of signal diversity is limited [1, 2]. Sensory drive, the optimization of communication signal efficiency through matching to the local environment, has been highlighted as a potential promoter of diversification and speciation [3]. The swordtail characin (Corynopoma riisei) is a tropical fish in which males display a flag-like ornament that elicits female foraging behavior during courtship. We show that the shape of the male ornament covaries with female diet across natural populations. More specifically, natural populations in which the female diet is more dominated by ants exhibit male ornaments more similar to the shape of an ant. Feeding experiments confirm that females habituated to a diet of ants prefer to bite at male ornaments from populations with a diet more dominated by ants. Our results show that the male ornament functions as a "fishing lure" that is diversifying in shape to match local variation in female search images employed during foraging. This direct link between variation in female feeding ecology and the evolutionary diversification of male sexual ornaments suggests that sensory drive may be a common engine of signal divergence.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22795697     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  10 in total

1.  Evolution of sexual cooperation from sexual conflict.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; John M Powers; Russell Lande; Trevor D Price
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differences in male coloration are predicted by divergent sexual selection between populations of a cichlid fish.

Authors:  O M Selz; R Thommen; M E R Pierotti; J M Anaya-Rojas; O Seehausen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolutionary novelty in communication between the sexes.

Authors:  E Dale Broder; Damian O Elias; Rafael L Rodríguez; Gil G Rosenthal; Brett M Seymoure; Robin M Tinghitella
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Climate adaptation and speciation: particular focus on reproductive barriers in Ficedula flycatchers.

Authors:  Anna Qvarnström; Murielle Ålund; S Eryn McFarlane; Päivi M Sirkiä
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Why do ovigerous females approach courting males? Female preferences and sensory biases in a fiddler crab.

Authors:  Chun-Chia Chou; Patricia R Y Backwell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; E Dale Broder; James H Gallagher; Aaron W Wikle; David M Zonana
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Darwin, sexual selection, and the brain.

Authors:  Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evolution of deceptive and true courtship songs in moths.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Takuma Takanashi; Annemarie Surlykke; Niels Skals; Yukio Ishikawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Testing sensory drive speciation in cichlid fish: Linking light conditions to opsin expression, opsin genotype and female mate preference.

Authors:  Daniel Shane Wright; Roel van Eijk; Lisa Schuart; Ole Seehausen; Ton G G Groothuis; Martine E Maan
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.516

10.  A pheromone antagonist liberates female sea lamprey from a sensory trap to enable reliable communication.

Authors:  Tyler J Buchinger; Anne M Scott; Skye D Fissette; Cory O Brant; Mar Huertas; Ke Li; Nicholas S Johnson; Weiming Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.