BACKGROUND: Reasons for pexelizumab lack of benefit in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention remain unclear. In a substudy of the APEX-AMI trial, we explored the hypothesis that early complement activation preceding drug administration explained the failure. METHODS: A panel of terminal complement complex proteins and fragments and biomarkers of inflammation, apoptosis, and high-risk features were assessed in serum obtained before and 24 hours after administration of placebo or pexelizumab and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 356) and in human umbilical vein endothelial cell cultures coincubated with serum (n = 45). RESULTS: In the placebo group, C5a and sC5b-9 levels increased by 37% (7.9-14.2 ηg/mL, P = .007) and 96% (442-845 ηg/mL, P < .0001), respectively, during the first 24 hours. Pexelizumab prevented the increase in C5a (P = .01 vs placebo), but not that of sC5b-9 (502-1,157 ηg/mL, not significant vs placebo). Levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin (IL) 6, IL-1ß, Regulated on Activation, Normal T Cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES) or Chemokine C-C motif ligand 5 (CCL5), and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide increased significantly in both groups; those of IL-10, IL-12, IL-1ra, and Interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10) or C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10) decreased. Pexelizumab halved the increase in IL-6 (+92% vs 156%, P = .01) without effects on other markers, including C-reactive protein and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide. In cell culture, pexelizumab inhibited C5a, sC5b-9, and membrane-bound C5b-9 by 92%, 75%, and 78%, respectively (all P < .0001), without influencing cytokine levels and cell apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: The blockage of both C5a and terminal complement in cell culture, but of C5a only in vivo with minimal effects on inflammation and risk biomarkers, supports the hypothesis that late administration of pexelizumab after the ischemia/reperfusion insult precluded adequate myocardial protection, resulting in a negative trial.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Reasons for pexelizumab lack of benefit in ST-elevation myocardial infarctionpatients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention remain unclear. In a substudy of the APEX-AMI trial, we explored the hypothesis that early complement activation preceding drug administration explained the failure. METHODS: A panel of terminal complement complex proteins and fragments and biomarkers of inflammation, apoptosis, and high-risk features were assessed in serum obtained before and 24 hours after administration of placebo or pexelizumab and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 356) and in human umbilical vein endothelial cell cultures coincubated with serum (n = 45). RESULTS: In the placebo group, C5a and sC5b-9 levels increased by 37% (7.9-14.2 ηg/mL, P = .007) and 96% (442-845 ηg/mL, P < .0001), respectively, during the first 24 hours. Pexelizumab prevented the increase in C5a (P = .01 vs placebo), but not that of sC5b-9 (502-1,157 ηg/mL, not significant vs placebo). Levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin (IL) 6, IL-1ß, Regulated on Activation, Normal T Cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES) or Chemokine C-C motif ligand 5 (CCL5), and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide increased significantly in both groups; those of IL-10, IL-12, IL-1ra, and Interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10) or C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10) decreased. Pexelizumab halved the increase in IL-6 (+92% vs 156%, P = .01) without effects on other markers, including C-reactive protein and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide. In cell culture, pexelizumab inhibited C5a, sC5b-9, and membrane-bound C5b-9 by 92%, 75%, and 78%, respectively (all P < .0001), without influencing cytokine levels and cell apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: The blockage of both C5a and terminal complement in cell culture, but of C5a only in vivo with minimal effects on inflammation and risk biomarkers, supports the hypothesis that late administration of pexelizumab after the ischemia/reperfusion insult precluded adequate myocardial protection, resulting in a negative trial.
Authors: Sean van Diepen; Wendimagegn G Alemayehu; Yinggan Zheng; Pierre Theroux; L Kristin Newby; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Christopher B Granger; Paul W Armstrong Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Sonia I Vlaicu; Alexandru Tatomir; Violeta Rus; Armugam P Mekala; Petru A Mircea; Florin Niculescu; Horea Rus Journal: Immunol Res Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.829
Authors: Vasile I Pavlov; Ying S Tan; Erin E McClure; Laura R La Bonte; Chenhui Zou; William B Gorsuch; Gregory L Stahl Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Marcin Wysoczynski; Mitesh Solanki; Sylwia Borkowska; Patrick van Hoose; Kenneth R Brittian; Sumanth D Prabhu; Mariusz Z Ratajczak; Gregg Rokosh Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Soeren E Pischke; A Gustavsen; H L Orrem; K H Egge; F Courivaud; H Fontenelle; A Despont; A K Bongoni; R Rieben; T I Tønnessen; M A Nunn; H Scott; H Skulstad; A Barratt-Due; T E Mollnes Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 17.165