Literature DB >> 22795212

Predicting suicide attempts with the SAD PERSONS scale: a longitudinal analysis.

James M Bolton1, Rae Spiwak, Jitender Sareen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The SAD PERSONS scale is a widely used risk assessment tool for suicidal behavior despite a paucity of supporting data. The objective of this study was to examine the ability of the scale in predicting suicide attempts.
METHOD: Participants consisted of consecutive referrals (N=4,019) over 2 years (January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010) to psychiatric services in the emergency departments of the 2 largest tertiary care hospitals in the province of Manitoba, Canada. SAD PERSONS and Modified SAD PERSONS (MSPS) scale scores were recorded for individuals at their index and all subsequent presentations. The 2 main outcome measures in the study included current suicide attempts (at index presentation) and future suicide attempts (within the next 6 months). The ability of the scales to predict suicide attempts was evaluated with logistic regression, sensitivity and specificity analyses, and receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: 566 people presented with suicide attempts (14.1% of the sample). Both SAD PERSONS and MSPS showed poor predictive ability for future suicide attempts. Compared to low risk scores, high risk baseline scores had low sensitivity (19.6% and 40.0%, respectively) and low positive predictive value (5.3% and 7.4%, respectively). SAD PERSONS did not predict suicide attempts better than chance (area under the curve =0.572; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.64; P value nonsignificant). Stepwise regression identified 5 original scale items that accounted for the greatest proportion of future suicide attempt variance. High risk scores using this model had high sensitivity (93.5%) and were associated with a 5-fold higher likelihood of future suicide attempt presentation (odds ratio =5.58; 95% CI, 2.24-13.86; P<.001).
CONCLUSION: In their current form, SAD PERSONS and MSPS do not accurately predict future suicide attempts. © Copyright 2012 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22795212     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.11m07362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  20 in total

Review 1.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 1. Disease Burden and Principles of Care.

Authors:  Raymond W Lam; Diane McIntosh; JianLi Wang; Murray W Enns; Theo Kolivakis; Erin E Michalak; Jitender Sareen; Wei-Yi Song; Sidney H Kennedy; Glenda M MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Sagar V Parikh; Arun V Ravindran
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Behind therapists' emotional responses to suicidal patients: A study of the narrative crisis model of suicide and clinicians' emotions.

Authors:  Gelan Ying; Lakshmi Chennapragada; Erica D Musser; Igor Galynker
Journal:  Suicide Life Threat Behav       Date:  2021-01-23

3.  Attitudes of acceptability and lack of condemnation toward suicide may be predictive of post-discharge suicide attempts.

Authors:  Igor Galynker; Zimri S Yaseen; Jessica Briggs; Fumitaka Hayashi
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 4.  Assessment of the acute psychiatric patient in the emergency department: legal cases and caveats.

Authors:  Benjamin Good; Ryan M Walsh; Geoffrey Alexander; Gregory Moore
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-04-15

5.  Scales for predicting risk following self-harm: an observational study in 32 hospitals in England.

Authors:  L Quinlivan; J Cooper; S Steeg; L Davies; K Hawton; D Gunnell; N Kapur
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Recent self-harm and psychological measures in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jason R Randall; Brian H Rowe; Kathryn A Dong; Ian Colman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Proposal for the Inclusion of Tobacco Use in Suicide Risk Scales: Results of a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Iván Echeverria; Miriam Cotaina; Antonio Jovani; Rafael Mora; Gonzalo Haro; Ana Benito
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Validation of the Chinese SAD PERSONS Scale to predict repeated self-harm in emergency attendees in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chia-Yi Wu; Hui-Chun Huang; Shu-I Wu; Fang-Ju Sun; Chiu-Ron Huang; Shen-Ing Liu
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Risk stratification using data from electronic medical records better predicts suicide risks than clinician assessments.

Authors:  Truyen Tran; Wei Luo; Dinh Phung; Richard Harvey; Michael Berk; Richard Lee Kennedy; Svetha Venkatesh
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 10.  Which are the most useful scales for predicting repeat self-harm? A systematic review evaluating risk scales using measures of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  L Quinlivan; J Cooper; L Davies; K Hawton; D Gunnell; N Kapur
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.