Literature DB >> 22793782

Effects of N(2)-alkylguanine, O(6)-alkylguanine, and abasic lesions on DNA binding and bypass synthesis by the euryarchaeal B-family DNA polymerase vent (exo(-)).

Seonhee Lim1, Insil Song, F Peter Guengerich, Jeong-Yun Choi.   

Abstract

Archaeal and eukaryotic B-family DNA polymerases (pols) mainly replicate chromosomal DNA but stall at lesions, which are often bypassed with Y-family pols. In this study, a B-family pol Vent (exo(-)) from the euryarchaeon Thermococcus litoralis was studied with three types of DNA lesions-N(2)-alkylG, O(6)-alkylG, and an abasic (AP) site-in comparison with a model Y-family pol Dpo4 from Sulfolobus solfataricus, to better understand the effects of various DNA modifications on binding, bypass efficiency, and fidelity of pols. Vent (exo(-)) readily bypassed N(2)-methyl(Me)G and O(6)-MeG, but was strongly blocked at O(6)-benzyl(Bz)G and N(2)-BzG, whereas Dpo4 efficiently bypassed N(2)-MeG and N(2)-BzG and partially bypassed O(6)-MeG and O(6)-BzG. Vent (exo(-)) bypassed an AP site to an extent greater than Dpo4, corresponding with steady-state kinetic data. Vent (exo(-)) showed ~110-, 180-, and 300-fold decreases in catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K(m)) for nucleotide insertion opposite an AP site, N(2)-MeG, and O(6)-MeG but ~1800- and 5000-fold decreases opposite O(6)-BzG and N(2)-BzG, respectively, as compared to G, whereas Dpo4 showed little or only ~13-fold decreases opposite N(2)-MeG and N(2)-BzG but ~260-370-fold decreases opposite O(6)-MeG, O(6)-BzG, and the AP site. Vent (exo(-)) preferentially misinserted G opposite N(2)-MeG, T opposite O(6)-MeG, and A opposite an AP site and N(2)-BzG, while Dpo4 favored correct C insertion opposite those lesions. Vent (exo(-)) and Dpo4 both bound modified DNAs with affinities similar to unmodified DNA. Our results indicate that Vent (exo(-)) is as or more efficient as Dpo4 in synthesis opposite O(6)-MeG and AP lesions, whereas Dpo4 is much or more efficient opposite (only) N(2)-alkylGs than Vent (exo(-)), irrespective of DNA-binding affinity. Our data also suggest that Vent (exo(-)) accepts nonbulky DNA lesions (e.g., N(2)- or O(6)-MeG and an AP site) as manageable substrates despite causing error-prone synthesis, whereas Dpo4 strongly favors minor-groove N(2)-alkylG lesions over major-groove or noninstructive lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22793782      PMCID: PMC3683241          DOI: 10.1021/tx300168p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  60 in total

1.  Snapshots of replication through an abasic lesion; structural basis for base substitutions and frameshifts.

Authors:  Hong Ling; François Boudsocq; Roger Woodgate; Wei Yang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  DNA adduct bypass polymerization by Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA polymerase Dpo4: analysis and crystal structures of multiple base pair substitution and frameshift products with the adduct 1,N2-ethenoguanine.

Authors:  Hong Zang; Angela K Goodenough; Jeong-Yun Choi; Adriana Irimia; Lioudmila V Loukachevitch; Ivan D Kozekov; Karen C Angel; Carmelo J Rizzo; Martin Egli; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  DNA damage, aging, and cancer.

Authors:  Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  DNA adducts of chemical carcinogens.

Authors:  A Dipple
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  The ability of a variety of polymerases to synthesize past site-specific cis-syn, trans-syn-II, (6-4), and Dewar photoproducts of thymidylyl-(3'-->5')-thymidine.

Authors:  C A Smith; J Baeten; J S Taylor
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-08-21       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Pyridyloxobutyl adduct O6-[4-oxo-4-(3-pyridyl)butyl]guanine is present in 4-(acetoxymethylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone-treated DNA and is a substrate for O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase.

Authors:  L Wang; T E Spratt; X K Liu; S S Hecht; A E Pegg; L A Peterson
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Characterization of a DNA polymerase from the hyperthermophile archaea Thermococcus litoralis. Vent DNA polymerase, steady state kinetics, thermal stability, processivity, strand displacement, and exonuclease activities.

Authors:  H Kong; R B Kucera; W E Jack
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-01-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Misincorporation and stalling at O(6)-methylguanine and O(6)-benzylguanine: evidence for inactive polymerase complexes.

Authors:  Adrienne M Woodside; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Pre-steady state kinetic studies show that an abasic site is a cognate lesion for the yeast Rev1 protein.

Authors:  John M Pryor; M Todd Washington
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-10-04

10.  Fidelity of DNA synthesis by the Thermococcus litoralis DNA polymerase--an extremely heat stable enzyme with proofreading activity.

Authors:  P Mattila; J Korpela; T Tenkanen; K Pitkänen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Biochemical characterization of eight genetic variants of human DNA polymerase κ involved in error-free bypass across bulky N(2)-guanyl DNA adducts.

Authors:  Insil Song; Eun-Jin Kim; In-Hyeok Kim; Eun-Mi Park; Kyung Eun Lee; Joo-Ho Shin; F Peter Guengerich; Jeong-Yun Choi
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Mechanism of aromatic amine carcinogen bypass by the Y-family polymerase, Dpo4.

Authors:  Alfonso Brenlla; David Rueda; Louis J Romano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The use of an artificial nucleotide for polymerase-based recognition of carcinogenic O6-alkylguanine DNA adducts.

Authors:  Laura A Wyss; Arman Nilforoushan; David M Williams; Andreas Marx; Shana J Sturla
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 16.971

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.