Literature DB >> 22791533

Does weekly direct observation and formal feedback improve intern patient care skills development? A randomized controlled trial.

Gretchen Shelesky1, Frank D'Amico, Ruta Marfatia, Anu Munshi, Stephen A Wilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Direct observation (DO) is considered to be an effective way to evaluate patient care. This study assesses if weekly direct observation with formal feedback (DO-FF) increases (1) clinical skills and (2) comfort with patient care skills (CWPCS) during the first 12 weeks of internship.
METHODS: A single-blinded, stratified, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with allocation concealment incorporating interns at a community hospital family medicine residency program was performed. Interns (n=14) were stratified by the predicted number of calls in a 2:1 ratio of intervention: control group. The intervention group received DO-FF four times/month on inpatient history and physicals (H&Ps) by a family medicine senior resident or fellow. To assess skills, all interns were videotaped doing H&Ps at the beginning, middle, and end of the study. These were scored by two independent, blinded physicians using a validated tool. For self-assessment, all interns took a patient care comfort survey (PCCS) at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Analysis was done via intention to treat.
RESULTS: At 6 weeks, interns who received weekly DO-FF had greater CWPCS on 32 of 35 questions. Eight were significantly different: (1) discussing end of life issues, (2) chest X ray interpretation, management of (3) congestive heart failure, (4) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (5) diabetes mellitus, (6) diabetic ketoacidosis, (7) stroke, and (8) venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism. In all but three questions, differences resolved by 12 weeks. Video data were not significantly different between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In certain aspects of patient care, DO-FF improved intern CWPCS at 6 weeks. There was no difference in the video assessments of clinical skills between the treatment groups. These results need to be further explored. However, this study showed that a well-designed RCT is feasible for educational research questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22791533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  6 in total

1.  Defining the role of the academic neurohospitalist in residency education.

Authors:  Naymee Velez-Ruiz; Jaffar Khan; James G Greene
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2014-07

2.  System for Central Venous Catheterization Training Using Computer Vision-Based Workflow Feedback.

Authors:  Rebecca Hisey; Daenis Camire; Jason Erb; Daniel Howes; Gabor Fichtinger; Tamas Ungi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 3.  Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Dennis Thomas; Jenifer Liang; Michael J Abramson; Johnson George; Elida Zairina
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Quality of written feedback given to medical students after introduction of real-time audio monitoring of clinical encounters.

Authors:  Michael Sanatani; Kylea Potvin; Henry Conter; Kimberly Trudgeon; Andrew Warner
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Feedback in Medical Education: A Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Joshua G Kornegay; Aaron Kraut; David Manthey; Rodney Omron; Holly Caretta-Weyer; Gloria Kuhn; Sandra Martin; Lalena M Yarris
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-03-22

6.  Differences in echocardiography interpretation techniques among trainees and expert readers.

Authors:  David Roy Anderson; Sarah Blissett; Patricia O'Sullivan; Atif Qasim
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2021-05-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.