Literature DB >> 22791357

The influence of the femoral force application point on tibial cementing pressure in cemented UKA: an experimental study.

Sebastian Jaeger1, Astrid Helling, Rudi G Bitsch, Joern B Seeger, Christian Schuld, Michael Clarius.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening is the major cause for implant failure in cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Central positioning of the femoral pressure during the tibial cementation process is recommended to achieve equal pressure and a good cementation result. The aim of this study was to verify the central position of the femoral force application point (FFAP) at 45° flexion of the knee and to investigate the influence of ligament tension and cement penetration pressure (CPP) for UKA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cemented Oxford UKAs were performed in 24 human legs. CPP and ligament tension forces (LTF) were measured. The FFAP was measured in a standardised manner in relation to the tibial implant length on lateral digital X-rays.
RESULTS: The FFAP at 45° of knee flexion is located at 53.5 % and is not significantly different from the FFAP at 0° (p = 0.768). The CPP shows mean values at the anterior portion of 13.97 kPa (SD 16.11), at the implant keel of 24.34 kPa (SD 25.21) and at the posterior portion of 36.58 kPa (SD 26.51). The LTF shows a mean value of 194.35 N (SD 83.77).
CONCLUSION: The central position of the FFAP for the investigated cemented UKA with single radius femoral component at 45° flexion of the knee could be confirmed. A flexion angle of <45° does not influence the position of the FFAP significantly. More than 45° of flexion should be avoided because the FFAP shifts backwards significantly and may cause increased pressures posteriorly and therefore tilting of the component occurs during the cementation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22791357     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1582-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  4 in total

1.  Effect of shape on bone cement polymerization time in knee joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  Jung-Ro Yoon; Young-Rok Ko; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anders M Refsum; Uy V Nguyen; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Anne M Fenstad; Regina K Lein; Peter Ellison; Paul J Høl; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions.

Authors:  Johannes Adrian Eckert; Rudi G Bitsch; Robert Sonntag; Tobias Reiner; Martin Schwarze; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 5.853

4.  Metal backed fixed-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasties using minimal invasive surgery: a promising outcome analysis of 132 cases.

Authors:  Joel Baur; Lukas Zwicky; Michael Tobias Hirschmann; Thomas Ilchmann; Martin Clauss
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.