| Literature DB >> 22791289 |
Laura Rosiñol1, Albert Oriol, Ana Isabel Teruel, Dolores Hernández, Javier López-Jiménez, Javier de la Rubia, Miquel Granell, Joan Besalduch, Luis Palomera, Yolanda González, María Asunción Etxebeste, Joaquín Díaz-Mediavilla, Miguel T Hernández, Felipe de Arriba, Norma C Gutiérrez, María Luisa Martín-Ramos, María Teresa Cibeira, María Victoria Mateos, Joaquín Martínez, Adrián Alegre, Juan José Lahuerta, Jesús San Miguel, Joan Bladé.
Abstract
The Spanish Myeloma Group conducted a trial to compare bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide/dexamethasone (TD) versus vincristine, BCNU, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone/vincristine, BCNU, doxorubicin, dexamethasone/bortezomib (VBMCP/VBAD/B) in patients aged 65 years or younger with multiple myeloma. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate postinduction and post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Three hundred eighty-six patients were allocated to VTD (130), TD (127), or VBMCP/VBAD/B (129). The CR rate was significantly higher with VTD than with TD (35% vs 14%, P = .001) or with VBMCP/VBAD/B (35% vs 21%, P = .01). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with VTD (56.2 vs 28.2 vs 35.5 months, P = .01). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the post-ASCT CR rate was higher with VTD than with TD (46% vs 24%, P = .004) or with VBMCP/VBAD/B (46% vs 38%, P = .1). Patients with high-risk cytogenetics had a shorter PFS and overall survival in the overall series and in all treatment groups. In conclusion, VTD resulted in a higher pre- and posttransplantation CR rate and in a significantly longer PFS although it was not able to overcome the poor prognosis of high-risk cytogenetics. Our results support the use of VTD as a highly effective induction regimen prior to ASCT. The study was registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00461747) and Eudra CT (no. 2005-001110-41).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22791289 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-408922
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113