BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of lung cancer presents an opportunity to motivate individuals to adopt health-promoting behavior. Little attention has been given to using this opportunity to also motivate relatives to change their health behaviors. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe health behaviors and readiness to change lifestyle, identify interest in health promotion programs, and examine concordance of health behaviors among smokers with lung cancer and their family members. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected once from 37 lung cancer patient-family member dyads. Standardized questionnaires were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics and percent agreement were used for analyses. RESULTS: Lung cancer patients and their family members had high rates of continued smoking (43% vs 30%), low intake of fruits and vegetables (92% vs 95%), and high rates of physical inactivity (84% vs 84%). Patients and family members indicated readiness to change behaviors within the next 6 months ranging from 63% for physical activity, 73% for diet, and 88% to quit smoking for patients and 81% for physical activity, 58% for diet, and 91% to quit smoking for family members. Interest in participating in a multiple behavioral risk reduction program was high for patients and family members. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients and their family members have multiple behavioral risk factors placing them at risk for poor health outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Oncology nurses are in a unique position to provide leadership in assessing health behaviors and implementing evidence-based interventions to enhance outcomes for patient-family member dyads with lung cancer.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of lung cancer presents an opportunity to motivate individuals to adopt health-promoting behavior. Little attention has been given to using this opportunity to also motivate relatives to change their health behaviors. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe health behaviors and readiness to change lifestyle, identify interest in health promotion programs, and examine concordance of health behaviors among smokers with lung cancer and their family members. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected once from 37 lung cancerpatient-family member dyads. Standardized questionnaires were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics and percent agreement were used for analyses. RESULTS:Lung cancerpatients and their family members had high rates of continued smoking (43% vs 30%), low intake of fruits and vegetables (92% vs 95%), and high rates of physical inactivity (84% vs 84%). Patients and family members indicated readiness to change behaviors within the next 6 months ranging from 63% for physical activity, 73% for diet, and 88% to quit smoking for patients and 81% for physical activity, 58% for diet, and 91% to quit smoking for family members. Interest in participating in a multiple behavioral risk reduction program was high for patients and family members. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients and their family members have multiple behavioral risk factors placing them at risk for poor health outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Oncology nurses are in a unique position to provide leadership in assessing health behaviors and implementing evidence-based interventions to enhance outcomes for patient-family member dyads with lung cancer.
Authors: Kerry S Courneya; Christine M Friedenreich; H Arthur Quinney; Anthony L A Fields; Lee W Jones; Adrian S Fairey Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: J A Blumenthal; W Jiang; M A Babyak; D S Krantz; D J Frid; R E Coleman; R Waugh; M Hanson; M Appelbaum; C O'Connor; J J Morris Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 1997-10-27
Authors: Catherine M Alfano; Robert C Klesges; David M Murray; Deborah J Bowen; Anne McTiernan; Mark W Vander Weg; Leslie A Robinson; Brenda Cartmel; Mark D Thornquist; Matt Barnett; Gary E Goodman; Gilbert S Omenn Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: M A Tucker; N Murray; E G Shaw; D S Ettinger; M Mabry; M H Huber; R Feld; F A Shepherd; D H Johnson; S C Grant; J Aisner; B E Johnson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1997-12-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J S Ostroff; P B Jacobsen; A B Moadel; R H Spiro; J P Shah; E W Strong; D H Kraus; S P Schantz Journal: Cancer Date: 1995-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lisa A Howell; Tabetha A Brockman; Pamela S Sinicrope; Christi A Patten; Paul A Decker; Shawna L Ehlers; Noralane M Lindor; Sandra K Nigon; Gloria M Petersen Journal: J Behav Health Date: 2013
Authors: Graham W Warren; James R Marshall; K Michael Cummings; Benjamin Toll; Ellen R Gritz; Alan Hutson; Seyedeh Dibaj; Roy Herbst; Carolyn Dresler Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Erin P Balogh; Carolyn Dresler; Mark E Fleury; Ellen R Gritz; Thomas J Kean; Matthew L Myers; Sharyl J Nass; Brenda Nevidjon; Benjamin A Toll; Graham W Warren; Roy S Herbst Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-12-04
Authors: Lisa A Howell; Tabetha A Brockman; Pamela S Sinicrope; Christi A Patten; Paul A Decker; Allan Busta; Shawn Stoddard; Sheila R McNallan; Ping Yang Journal: Adv Cancer Prev Date: 2016-06-20
Authors: William H C Li; M P Wang; K Y Ho; Katherine K W Lam; Derek Y T Cheung; Yannes T Y Cheung; T H Lam; Sophia S C Chan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mary Wells; Patricia Aitchison; Fiona Harris; Gozde Ozakinci; Andrew Radley; Linda Bauld; Vikki Entwistle; Alastair Munro; Sally Haw; Bill Culbard; Brian Williams Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Chandylen L Nightingale; Laurie E Steffen; Janet A Tooze; William Petty; Suzanne C Danhauer; Hoda Badr; Kathryn E Weaver Journal: Glob Adv Health Med Date: 2019-07-17