Literature DB >> 22790901

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in neonatal cholestasis.

Eyal Shteyer1, Dov Wengrower, Ishay Benuri-Silbiger, David Gozal, Michael Wilschanski, Eran Goldin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not as widely used in children as in adults and is performed in few specialized centers. The aim of the present study was to review the experience of ERCP in children younger than 3 months in a national referral center.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all of the babies younger than 3 months who underwent ERCP between 2000 and 2010. Data on demographics, diagnosis, type of anesthesia, treatments, and complications were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 27 babies, 14 boys, were examined. Median age was 55 days (range 33-89). Ultrasound was normal in 16 infants, whereas others included small gallbladder (4), biliary stones (3), and dilated bile ducts (3). Thirteen infants underwent earlier liver biopsy, which was inconclusive. ERCP led to the diagnosis of biliary atresia in 13 infants who had subsequent surgery. In others, ERCP showed choledochal cyst (1), biliary stones (2), dilated bile ducts (1), and normal examination (6); there were 5 failures. The final diagnoses in our cohort were extrahepatic biliary atresia (15), biliary stones (5), neonatal hepatitis (4), choledochal cyst (1), paucity of intrahepatic bile duct (1), and congenital hepatic fibrosis (1). Diagnoses in the failed ERCP group included biliary atresia (2), bile duct paucity (1), and biliary stones (2). In 4 (19%) infants with clinical suspicion of extrahepatic biliary atresia, a normal ERCP ruled out the diagnosis and avoided an intraoperative cholangiogram. No complications, including pancreatitis, were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: ERCP in infants is feasible and has no complications. It may serve as an additional diagnostic tool in neonatal cholestasis in inconclusive cases and may prevent more invasive procedures. ERCP may be part of the algorithm of neonatal cholestasis when it is available and other investigations fail to confirm a diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22790901     DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318259267a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  11 in total

1.  Practical approach for the diagnosis of biliary atresia on imaging, part 2: magnetic resonance cholecystopancreatography, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, percutaneous cholecysto-cholangiography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous liver biopsy, risk scores and decisional flowchart.

Authors:  Marcello Napolitano; Stéphanie Franchi-Abella; Beatrice Maria Damasio; Thomas Angell Augdal; Fred Efraim Avni; Costanza Bruno; Kassa Darge; Damjana Ključevšek; Annemieke Simone Littooij; Luisa Lobo; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Michael Riccabona; Samuel Stafrace; Seema Toso; Magdalena Maria Woźniak; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli; Lil-Sofie Ording Müller; Philippe Petit
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-05-11

2.  Hospital Utilization, Treatment Modalities, and Mortality Using Different Biopsy Methods in Infants With Biliary Atresia.

Authors:  Anmol Mittal; Aaron Kahlam; Alexander Le; Sushil Ahlawat; Iona M Monteiro
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-04

Review 3.  Complications of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Pediatric Patients; A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Danielle Usatin; Melissa Fernandes; Isabel E Allen; Emily R Perito; James Ostroff; Melvin B Heyman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: Retrospective series with a long-term follow-up and literature review.

Authors:  Yavor Asenov; Melih Akın; Serdar Cantez; Feryal Gün Soysal; Yaman Tekant
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography vs the Olympus V-scope system.

Authors:  Martin Raithel; Andreas Nägel; Jürgen Maiss; Dane Wildner; Alexander Fritzkarl Hagel; Sandra Braun; Hiwot Diebel; Eckhart Georg Hahn
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  ERCP in babies: Low risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis - results from a multicentre survey.

Authors:  Martin Goetz; Philipp Andersen; Jacques Bergman; Nicola Frei; Arthur Schmidt; Georg Kähler; Peter Martus; Alexander Dechêne
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  ERCP in infants, children and adolescents is feasible and safe: results from a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Jasmin Felux; Ekkehard Sturm; Andreas Busch; Emanuel Zerabruck; Florian Graepler; Dietmar Stüker; Andreas Manger; Hans-Joachim Kirschner; Gunnar Blumenstock; Nisar P Malek; Martin Goetz
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 8.  Neonatal Cholestasis - Differential Diagnoses, Current Diagnostic Procedures, and Treatment.

Authors:  Thomas Götze; Holger Blessing; Christian Grillhösl; Patrick Gerner; André Hoerning
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Biliary atresia: 50 years after the first kasai.

Authors:  Barbara E Wildhaber
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2012-12-06

10.  Diversity of disorders causing neonatal cholestasis - the experience of a tertiary pediatric center in Germany.

Authors:  André Hoerning; Simon Raub; Alexander Dechêne; Michelle N Brosch; Simone Kathemann; Peter F Hoyer; Patrick Gerner
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.