Literature DB >> 22790892

Short-term results of endoscopic (Okutsu method) versus palmar incision open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Soichi Ejiri1, Shin-ichi Kikuchi, Masato Maruya, Yasufumi Sekiguchi, Ryoichi Kawakami, Shin-ichi Konno.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The surgical techniques widely used in Japan for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are the Okutsu method of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and palmar incision for open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). However, no prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared treatment outcomes between these two procedures. This RCT compared short-term outcomes between ECTR and OCTR for CTS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 101 hands (79 patients) treated in the department. ECTR was performed on 51 hands (40 patients), and OCTR was performed on 50 hands (39 patients). For assessment items, the following patient-based outcomes were evaluated: 1) changes in subjective symptoms; and 2) impairment in activities of daily living. The following items were also evaluated by physicians: 3) abductor pollicis brevis-distal latency (APB-DL); 4) sensation; and 5) muscle strength. All these assessments were made in postoperative weeks 4 and 12.
RESULTS: Recovery of muscle strength at postoperative week 4 was significantly better with ECTR (p< 0.05), but no significant differences were identified between groups in any of the other items. The ECTR group showed transient postoperative exacerbation of subjective symptoms in two hands (4%) and of APB-DL in three hands (6%). Comparison of hands with improved and exacerbated postoperative APB-DL in the ECTR group revealed significantly greater preoperative electrophysiological severity in exacerbated hands (p< 0.05). The cause of postoperative exacerbation with ECTR was considered to be transient nerve dysfunction resulting from the unique aspects of the ECTR procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OCTR, ECTR offers superior recovery of muscle strength in the early postoperative period. At the same time, ECTR may carry a risk of transient nerve dysfunction in the early postoperative period. Caution must therefore be exercised when using ECTR for patients with severe electrophysiological findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22790892     DOI: 10.5387/fms.58.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci        ISSN: 0016-2590


  11 in total

1.  Similar effectiveness of the open versus endoscopic technique for carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Seyit Ali Gümüştaş; Burcu Ekmekçi; Haci Bayram Tosun; Mehmet Müfit Orak; Halil İbrahim Bekler
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-08-30

2.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Fixation of Distal Radial Fractures: A Computer Model-Based Evaluation of Three Operative Modalities.

Authors:  Prashant V Rajan; Rameez A Qudsi; George S M Dyer; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Eli T Sayegh; Robert J Strauch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Rates of Complications and Secondary Surgeries of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release.

Authors:  Dafang Zhang; Philip Blazar; Brandon E Earp
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 5.  A handy review of carpal tunnel syndrome: From anatomy to diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad; Emad Nosair; Andrea Vegh; Afshin Mohammadi; Adam Akkad; Emal Lesha; Mohammad Hossein Mohammadi; Doaa Sayed; Ali Davarian; Tooraj Maleki-Miyandoab; Anwarul Hasan
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28

6.  Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Dongqing Zuo; Zifei Zhou; Hongsheng Wang; Yuxin Liao; Longpo Zheng; Yingqi Hua; Zhengdong Cai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis; Bryan Chung; Roberta W Scherer; Diana Elbourne; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-06-30

8.  Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yueying Li; Wenqi Luo; Guangzhi Wu; Shusen Cui; Zhan Zhang; Xiaosong Gu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Endoscopic and Open Release Similarly Safe for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Haris S Vasiliadis; Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Ian Shrier; Michael P Lunn; Ruth Brassington; Rob J P Scholten; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery- A Systematic Review of Open and Endoscopic Approaches.

Authors:  Vwaire Orhurhu; Sebastian Orman; Jacquelin Peck; Ivan Urits; Mariam Salisu Orhurhu; Mark R Jones; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan D Kaye; Charles Odonkor; Sameer Hirji; Elyse M Cornett; Farnad Imani; Giustino Varrassi; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.