Literature DB >> 22790710

Simultaneous gastric band removal and sleeve gastrectomy: a comparison with front-line sleeve gastrectomy.

Lionel Rebibo1, Emile Mensah, Pierre Verhaeghe, Abdennaceur Dhahri, Cyril Cosse, Momar Diouf, Jean-Marc Regimbeau.   

Abstract

The placement of a gastric band (GB) prior to a sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) would increase postoperative complications, whether it is withdrawn or not at the time of the LSG. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate and compare postoperative morbidity and outcome weight for simultaneous GB removal (RGB) and LSG (the RGB + LSG group) and front-line LSG only (the LSG group) after unsuccessful GB. From May 2005 to May 2009, 305 patients underwent first- or second-line LSG at Amiens University Hospital. The primary endpoint was the postoperative complication rate (according to the Clavien classification) in the RGB + LSG and LSG groups. The secondary endpoints were intra-operative data, postoperative data, and weight loss over a period of 2 years (body mass index, percentage of excess weight loss, and percentage of excess body mass index (BMI) loss). Univariate and multivariate propensity score analyses were used to search for independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The RGB + LSG group (n = 46) had a mean age of 42 and a mean BMI of 44 kg/m(2). The indication for surgery was renewed weight gain or insufficient weight loss in 68 % of these cases. The LSG group (n = 259) had a mean age of 41 and a mean BMI of 49.2 kg/m(2). All procedures were performed laparoscopically. The complication rate was 8.6 % in the RGB + LSG group and 8 % in the SG group (p = 0.42). The fistula rates in the two groups were 4.3 and 3.4 %, respectively (p = 0.56), and the mean BMI at 2 years was 33.4 kg/m(2) (RGB + LSG group) and 34.4 kg/m(2), respectively (p = 0.83). The operating time for LSG (after subtracting the time associated with RGB for a combined procedure) averaged 107 min, whereas the operating time for front-line LSG was 89 min (p = 0.011). The propensity score analysis failed to find independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The performance of RGB + LSG is feasible and does not increase the postoperative morbidity rate. Weight loss after RGB + LSG validates the concept of "restrictive surgery after restrictive surgery". We did not find any independent risk factors that would have justified the avoidance of RGB + SG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22790710     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-012-0689-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  24 in total

1.  Sleeve gastrectomy: technique and results.

Authors:  A Dhahri; P Verhaeghe; H Hajji; D Fuks; R Badaoui; J-B Deguines; J-M Regimbeau
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.043

2.  The First International Consensus Summit for Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25-27, 2007.

Authors:  Mervyn Deitel; Ross D Crosby; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Re-operation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding leads to a further decrease in BMI and obesity-related co-morbidities: results in 33 patients.

Authors:  R Schouten; F M H van Dielen; J W M Greve
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates.

Authors:  M Suter; J M Calmes; A Paroz; V Giusti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Failed restrictive surgery: is sleeve gastrectomy a good revisional procedure?

Authors:  Moises Jacobs; Eddie Gomez; Roderick Romero; Irving Jorge; Roberto Fogel; Carlos Celaya
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Two-year results on morbidity, weight loss and quality of life of sleeve gastrectomy as first procedure, sleeve gastrectomy after failure of gastric banding and gastric banding.

Authors:  Charles Sabbagh; Pierre Verhaeghe; Abdennaceur Dhahri; Olivier Brehant; David Fuks; Rachid Badaoui; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Surgical treatment of morbid obesity by adjustable gastric band: the case for a conservative strategy in the case of failure - a 9-year series.

Authors:  Jérôme Dargent
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Chevallier; Franck Zinzindohoué; Richard Douard; Jean-Philippe Blanche; Jean-Louis Berta; Jean-Jacques Altman; Paul-Henri Cugnenc
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Favorable early results of gastric banding for morbid obesity: the American experience.

Authors:  C J Ren; M Weiner; J W Allen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Gastric banding: conversion to sleeve, bypass, or DS.

Authors:  Michel Gagner; Andrew A Gumbs
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  8 in total

1.  Should the lap band be removed to treat pseudoachalasia?

Authors:  George A Fielding
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-07

2.  What to do when it is technically impossible to perform laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Lionel Rebibo; Abdennaceur Dhahri; Pierre Verhaeghe; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review of Comparative Outcomes with Respective Primary Procedures.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar; Yitka Graham; William R J Carr; Neil Jennings; Norbert Schroeder; Shlok Balupuri; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Reply to "simultaneous gastric band removal and sleeve gastrectomy complication rate. Letter".

Authors:  Lionel Rebibo; Pierre Verhaeghe; Abdennaceur Dhahri; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Simultaneous gastric band removal and sleeve gastrectomy complication rate.

Authors:  Fabio Cesare Campanile; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Gastric Stenosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Lionel Rebibo; Sami Hakim; Abdennaceur Dhahri; Thierry Yzet; Richard Delcenserie; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative morbidity is determined by type of procedure.

Authors:  D Stefanidis; K Malireddy; T Kuwada; R Phillips; E Zoog; K S Gersin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes After Revisional Bariatric Surgery Following a Failed Adjustable Gastric Band.

Authors:  Alistair J Sharples; Vasileios Charalampakis; Markos Daskalakis; Abd A Tahrani; Rishi Singhal
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.