BACKGROUND: The increasing number of living kidney donors in the last decade has led to the development of novel surgical techniques for live-donor nephrectomy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the current status of the surgical approach in Europe. METHODS: A survey was sent to 119 transplant centers in 12 European countries. Questions included the number of donors, the technique used, and the acceptance of donors with comorbidities. RESULTS: Ninety-six centers (81%) replied. The number of living donors per center ranged from 0 to 124. Thirty-one institutions (32%) harvested kidneys using open techniques only. Six centers (6%) applied both endoscopic and open techniques; 59 centers (61%) performed endoscopic donor nephrectomy only. Lack of evidence that endoscopic techniques provide superior results was the main reason for still performing open donor nephrectomy. In seven centers, a lumbotomy is still performed. Seventy-two centers (75%) accept donors with a body mass index of more than 30 kg/m, the median upper limit in these centers was 35 kg/m (range, 31-40). Donors with an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification higher than 1 were accepted in 55% of the centers. CONCLUSIONS: Live kidney donation in general and minimally invasive donor nephrectomy in particular are more commonly applied in Northern and Western Europe. However, a classic lumbotomy is still performed in a minority of centers. Because minimally invasive techniques have been proven superior, more attention should be given to educational programs in this field to let many kidney donors benefit.
BACKGROUND: The increasing number of living kidney donors in the last decade has led to the development of novel surgical techniques for live-donor nephrectomy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the current status of the surgical approach in Europe. METHODS: A survey was sent to 119 transplant centers in 12 European countries. Questions included the number of donors, the technique used, and the acceptance of donors with comorbidities. RESULTS: Ninety-six centers (81%) replied. The number of living donors per center ranged from 0 to 124. Thirty-one institutions (32%) harvested kidneys using open techniques only. Six centers (6%) applied both endoscopic and open techniques; 59 centers (61%) performed endoscopic donor nephrectomy only. Lack of evidence that endoscopic techniques provide superior results was the main reason for still performing open donor nephrectomy. In seven centers, a lumbotomy is still performed. Seventy-two centers (75%) accept donors with a body mass index of more than 30 kg/m, the median upper limit in these centers was 35 kg/m (range, 31-40). Donors with an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification higher than 1 were accepted in 55% of the centers. CONCLUSIONS: Live kidney donation in general and minimally invasive donor nephrectomy in particular are more commonly applied in Northern and Western Europe. However, a classic lumbotomy is still performed in a minority of centers. Because minimally invasive techniques have been proven superior, more attention should be given to educational programs in this field to let many kidney donors benefit.
Authors: Roger Wahba; Robert Kleinert; Martin Hellmich; Nadine Heiermann; Georg Dieplinger; Hans A Schlößer; Denise Buchner; Christine Kurschat; Dirk L Stippel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Karel W J Klop; Farah Hussain; Oguzhan Karatepe; Niels F M Kok; Jan N M Ijzermans; Frank J M F Dor Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot; Cees J H M van Laarhoven; Michel F P van der Jagt; Andries J Hoitsma; Michiel C Warlé Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Jeffrey A Lafranca; Emerentia Q W Spoon; Jacqueline van de Wetering; Jan N M IJzermans; Frank J M F Dor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jeannette D Widmer; Andrea Schlegel; Philipp Kron; Marc Schiesser; Jens G Brockmann; Markus K Muller Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 2.264