| Literature DB >> 22790412 |
Takashi Komabayashi1, Chul Ahn, Kang-Ju Kim, Hyo-Won Oh.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the dental curriculum of the traditional six-year system with that of the new four-year (graduate-entry) system in South Korea. There are 11 dental schools in South Korea: six are public and five are private. Eight offer the new four-year program and the other three offer the traditional six-year program. Descriptive analyses were conducted using bibliographic data and local information along with statistical analyses such as chi-square tests. In the six-year programs, clinical dentistry subjects were taught almost equally in practical and didactic courses, while the basic science courses were taught more often as practical courses (P < 0.0001). In the four-year programs, both the basic science and clinical dentistry subjects were taught didactically more often; while more dentistry subjects were taught than basic sciences (P = 0.004). The four-year program model in South Korea is more focused on dentistry than on basic science, while both basic and clinical dentistry subjects were equally taught in the six-year program.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22790412 PMCID: PMC4090920 DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.54.191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Sci ISSN: 1343-4934 Impact factor: 1.556