Literature DB >> 22790356

Fukushima nuclear incident: the challenges of risk communication.

Andrew G Robertson1, Andrew Pengilley.   

Abstract

On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake occurred off the Sanriku coast of Japan, which resulted in multiple tsunamis. The earthquake and tsunami damaged several nuclear power stations, with the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant being the worst affected, which led Japan to declare a State of Nuclear Emergency. As of November 9, 2011, the National Police Agency of Japan reported a death toll of 15 836 people, with 3664 people still reported missing, following the earthquake and tsunami. Australian radiation health advisers were deployed to Tokyo early in the nuclear emergency to assist the Australian Embassy in assessing the radiological threat, to provide risk advice to Embassy staff and Australian citizens in Japan, and to plan for any further deterioration in the nuclear situation. This article explores the challenges of risk assessment, risk communication, and contingency planning for expatriate staff in the worst nuclear incident since Chernobyl, outlines what measures were successful in addressing heightened perceived risks, and identifies areas where further research is required, particularly in a radiological context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22790356     DOI: 10.1177/1010539512453258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health        ISSN: 1010-5395            Impact factor:   1.399


  3 in total

Review 1.  Disaster Preparedness and Response for the Burn Mass Casualty Incident in the Twenty-first Century.

Authors:  Randy D Kearns; David E Marcozzi; Noran Barry; Lewis Rubinson; Charles Scott Hultman; Preston B Rich
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.017

2.  The Effect of Risk Communication on Public Behavior to Non-Conventional Terrorism-Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Moran Bodas; Morel Ragoler; Yossi Rabby; Esther Krasner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Returning Home after Decontamination? Applying the Protective Action Decision Model to a Nuclear Accident Scenario.

Authors:  Joel Rasmussen; Petter B Wikström
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.