Literature DB >> 22790115

rTMS age-dependent response in treatment-resistant depressed subjects: a mini-review.

Stefano Pallanti1, Andrea Cantisani, Giacomo Grassi, Sarah Antonini, Chiara Cecchelli, Jiulia Burian, Gilla Cauli, Leonardo Quercioli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In old age, depressive syndromes often affect people with chronic medical illnesses, cognitive impairment, and disability, which can worsen the outcomes of other medical disorders and promote disability. Repetitive magnetic transcranial stimulation (rTMS) is a simple and effective treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Therefore the use of rTMS could be of particular potential benefit in treatment-resistant elderly patients, who often cannot tolerate the higher doses of drugs needed or show phenomena of intolerance and interaction. However, several studies assessing the efficacy of rTMS found smaller response rates in elderly patients when compared to younger samples. Nevertheless, the correlation between age and response is still a controversial issue, and there is no strong evidence to date. The aim of our study was to retest the effectiveness and safety of low-frequency rTMS in a 3 weeks active treatment in a group of resistant-depressed patients, and to investigate the role of age in the response to stimulation treatment.
METHODS: Enrolled in this study were 102 treatment-resistant depressed patients. The patients were treated with low-frequency rTMS over the right dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 3 weeks with a simple protocol (420 pulses per session for 15 sessions). At baseline, at the end of the second week, and at the end of the third week of treatment, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) were administered.
RESULTS: Low-frequency rTMS on the prefrontal dorsolateral right area resulted in a statistically significant reduction of mean HAM-D scores in the entire group of patients at the end of treatment. The responder's rate in the whole group at the end of the third week was 56.86%. A significant inverse relationship between HAM-D reduction and age was found in the "older" (>60 years old) group, not in the "younger" (<60 years old) group.
CONCLUSION: Results from this study show that low-frequency rTMS over the right DLPFC, with a relatively low number of pulses (420 pulses per session) and a relatively short period of treatment, is effective in the treatment of resistant patients (in a sample also including elderly patients) in a 3-weeks treatment protocol with a low reduction with the progress of age. Furthermore, we found a greater response in younger patients and an inverse correlation between age and treatment response. Adaptations of the protocol according to age are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22790115     DOI: 10.1017/S1092852912000417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Spectr        ISSN: 1092-8529            Impact factor:   3.790


  19 in total

Review 1.  Neuromodulation therapies for geriatric depression.

Authors:  Verònica Gálvez; Kerrie-Anne Ho; Angelo Alonzo; Donel Martin; Duncan George; Colleen K Loo
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for geriatric depression: Promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Priyadharshini Sabesan; Sudheer Lankappa; Najat Khalifa; Vasudevan Krishnan; Rahul Gandhi; Lena Palaniyappan
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-22

3.  Activating memories of depression alters the experience of voluntary action.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Kristina M Swiderski; Riley Farquhar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Use of the Temperament and Character Inventory to Predict Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depression.

Authors:  Shan H Siddiqi; Ravikumar Chockalingam; C Robert Cloninger; Eric J Lenze; Pilar Cristancho
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.325

5.  The lack of association between components of metabolic syndrome and treatment resistance in depression.

Authors:  Marina Sagud; Alma Mihaljevic-Peles; Suzana Uzun; Bjanka Vuksan Cusa; Oliver Kozumplik; Suzan Kudlek-Mikulic; Maja Mustapic; Ivan Barisic; Dorotea Muck-Seler; Nela Pivac
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Current clinical practice of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatry, a German sample.

Authors:  Charles Timäus; Jonathan Vogelgsang; Bernhard Kis; Katrin Radenbach; Claus Wolff-Menzler; Kiriaki Mavridou; Stephan Gyßer; Philipp Hessmann; Jens Wiltfang
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 7.  Comparing the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Beppe Micallef-Trigona
Journal:  Depress Res Treat       Date:  2014-07-21

8.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and potential cortical and trigeminothalamic mechanisms in migraine.

Authors:  Anna P Andreou; Philip R Holland; Simon Akerman; Oliver Summ; Joe Fredrick; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Predictors of Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression: A Review of Recent Updates.

Authors:  Sujita Kumar Kar
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating depression in elderly patients.

Authors:  Gokben Hizli Sayar; Eylem Ozten; Oguz Tan; Nevzat Tarhan
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.