BACKGROUND: Experimental changes in resting cerebral blood flow (CBF) affect task-related blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) responses. Since patients with schizophrenia have been shown to have abnormal resting CBF, we sought to determine whether differences between patients and healthy controls in resting CBF contribute to group differences in BOLD response. METHODS: BOLD images were acquired in nineteen patients and twenty healthy controls looking at photographs of faces, and resting CBF was measured by arterial spinning labeling. Resting CBF was then used to adjust group differences in task-related BOLD signal increases in linear models. RESULTS: Patients had different resting CBF from healthy controls in right basal ganglion and bilateral thalami. Associations between resting CBF and delta BOLD were evident in bilateral prefrontal areas, visual processing areas and right fusiform gyrus. Other areas showed significant three-way interactions among group, delta BOLD and resting CBF. Incorporating resting CBF when modeling group differences in BOLD responses identified areas of group differences in task-related delta BOLD response that were not evident in simple group contrasts. These were in right inferior frontal cortex, left insula, left middle frontal cortex and bilateral frontal poles. CONCLUSION: Adjusting for inter-group differences in resting CBF altered inter-group differences in task-related BOLD response in some areas, suggesting that assessing resting CBF in task-related BOLD studies could increase sensitivity and validity. In multiple regions, the relationship between resting CBF and task-related signal increases in BOLD differed between patients and controls, providing new evidence of possible metabolic and/or vascular pathology. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: Experimental changes in resting cerebral blood flow (CBF) affect task-related blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) responses. Since patients with schizophrenia have been shown to have abnormal resting CBF, we sought to determine whether differences between patients and healthy controls in resting CBF contribute to group differences in BOLD response. METHODS: BOLD images were acquired in nineteen patients and twenty healthy controls looking at photographs of faces, and resting CBF was measured by arterial spinning labeling. Resting CBF was then used to adjust group differences in task-related BOLD signal increases in linear models. RESULTS:Patients had different resting CBF from healthy controls in right basal ganglion and bilateral thalami. Associations between resting CBF and delta BOLD were evident in bilateral prefrontal areas, visual processing areas and right fusiform gyrus. Other areas showed significant three-way interactions among group, delta BOLD and resting CBF. Incorporating resting CBF when modeling group differences in BOLD responses identified areas of group differences in task-related delta BOLD response that were not evident in simple group contrasts. These were in right inferior frontal cortex, left insula, left middle frontal cortex and bilateral frontal poles. CONCLUSION: Adjusting for inter-group differences in resting CBF altered inter-group differences in task-related BOLD response in some areas, suggesting that assessing resting CBF in task-related BOLD studies could increase sensitivity and validity. In multiple regions, the relationship between resting CBF and task-related signal increases in BOLD differed between patients and controls, providing new evidence of possible metabolic and/or vascular pathology. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Adrienne C Lahti; Henry H Holcomb; Martin A Weiler; Deborah R Medoff; Carol A Tamminga Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: D D Miller; N C Andreasen; D S O'Leary; G L Watkins; L L Boles Ponto; R D Hichwa Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2001-04-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Raquel E Gur; Claire McGrath; Robin M Chan; Lee Schroeder; Travis Turner; Bruce I Turetsky; Christian Kohler; David Alsop; Joseph Maldjian; J Daniel Ragland; Ruben C Gur Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Patricia Westmoreland Corson; Daniel S O'Leary; Del D Miller; Nancy C Andreasen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Sebastian Walther; Katharina Stegmayer; Andrea Federspiel; Stephan Bohlhalter; Roland Wiest; Petra V Viher Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Christian S Legind; Brian V Broberg; Rachel Brouwer; René C W Mandl; Bjørn H Ebdrup; Simon J Anhøj; Maria H Jensen; Rikke Hilker; Birgitte Fagerlund; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; Birte Y Glenthøj; Egill Rostrup Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Kay Jann; Dylan G Gee; Emily Kilroy; Simon Schwab; Robert X Smith; Tyrone D Cannon; Danny J J Wang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Faith M Hanlon; Nicholas A Shaff; Andrew B Dodd; Josef M Ling; Juan R Bustillo; Christopher C Abbott; Shannon F Stromberg; Swala Abrams; Denise S Lin; Andrew R Mayer Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 5.038