Literature DB >> 22789635

The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery.

M Cassetta1, A Di Mambro, M Giansanti, L V Stefanelli, C Cavallini.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical relevance of the potential mechanical error (intrinsic error) caused by the cylinder-burr gap in a 'single type' stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. 129 implants were inserted in 12 patients using 18 templates. The pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were matched allowing comparison of the planned implants with the placed ones. Considering only the angular deviation values, the t test was used to determine the influence of the guide fixation and the arch of support on accuracy values. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to correlate angular deviation and bone density. The intrinsic error was mathematically evaluated. t test results indicated that the use of fixing screws (P=009) and the upper arch support (P=027) resulted in better accuracy. The Pearson correlation coefficient (0.229) indicated a significant linear correlation between angular deviations and bone density (P=009). A mean intrinsic error of 2.57 was mathematically determined considering only the angular deviation, as it was not influenced by other variables. The intrinsic error is a significant factor compared to all the variables that could potentially affect the accuracy of computer-aided implant placement.
Copyright © 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22789635     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement.

Authors:  Wei Geng; Changying Liu; Yucheng Su; Jun Li; Yanmin Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

2.  An assessment of template-guided implant surgery in terms of accuracy and related factors.

Authors:  Jee-Ho Lee; Ji-Man Park; Soung-Min Kim; Myung-Joo Kim; Jong-Ho Lee; Myung-Jin Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Accuracy of a direct drill-guiding system with minimal tolerance of surgical instruments used for implant surgery: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Du-Hyeong Lee; Seo-Young An; Min-Ho Hong; Kyoung-Bae Jeon; Kyu-Bok Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Accuracy Evaluation of a Stereolithographic Surgical Template for Dental Implant Insertion Using 3D Superimposition Protocol.

Authors:  Corina Marilena Cristache; Silviu Gurbanescu
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-05-07

5.  Accuracy of densitometry of two cone beam computed tomography equipment in comparison with computed tomography.

Authors:  Sina Haghanifar; Sajad Yousefi; Ehsan Moudi; Farida Abesi; Ali Bijani; Ali Akbar Moghadamnia; Mehrdad Nabahati
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-05-25

Review 6.  Accuracy of computer-guided surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Amaral Alves Marlière; Maurício Silva Demètrio; Leonardo Santos Picinini; Rodrigo Guerra De Oliveira; Henrique Duque De Miranda Chaves Netto
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

7.  Alveolar ridge preservation and primary stability as influencing factors on the transfer accuracy of static guided implant placement: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Liesa Brunken; Cornelia Edelmann; Jens Dreyhaupt; Heike Rudolph; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  CAD/CAM implant surgical guides: maximum errors in implant positioning attributable to the properties of the metal sleeve/osteotomy drill combination.

Authors:  Dimitrios Apostolakis; Georgios Kourakis
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-11-09

Review 9.  A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Florian Kernen; Jaap Kramer; Laura Wanner; Daniel Wismeijer; Katja Nelson; Tabea Flügge
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Accuracy of mucosa supported guided dental implant surgery.

Authors:  Andoni Jones
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2018-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.