Literature DB >> 22789616

Nanofiber size-dependent sensitivity of fibroblast directionality to the methodology for scaffold alignment.

Vasudha Chaurey1, Frank Block, Yi-Hsuan Su, Po-Chieh Chiang, Edward Botchwey, Chia-Fu Chou, Nathan S Swami.   

Abstract

The sensitivity of fibroblast guidance on directional cues provided by aligned nanofibers is studied for scaffolds of successively smaller fiber sizes (740±280, 245±85, 140±40, and 80±10 nm) fabricated using mandrel and electrical alignment methodologies for electrospun nanofibers (∼10° angular deviation (AD)), as well as nanoimprint methodologies for perfectly aligned fibers (0° AD). On aligned scaffolds of large fibers (∼740 nm) cell directionality closely follows the underlying fibers, irrespective of the alignment method. However, on mandrel aligned scaffolds of successively smaller fibers the cell directionality exhibits greater deviations from the underlying fiber alignment due to the higher likelihood of interaction of cell lamellipodia with multiple, rather than single, nanofibers. Using electrically aligned scaffolds, fibroblast directionality deviations can be maintained in the range of nanofiber alignment deviation for fiber sizes down to ∼100 nm. This improvement in cell guidance is attributed to molecular scale directional adhesion cues for cell receptors, which occur within electrically aligned scaffolds due to fiber polarization parallel to the geometric alignment axis of the nanofiber under the modified electric field during electrospinning. While fibroblast directionality is similar on electrically aligned vs. nanoimprinted scaffolds for fiber sizes >100 nm, cell directionality is influenced more strongly by the perfect alignment cues of the latter on ∼100 nm fiber scaffolds. The scaffold alignment methodology is hence highly significant, especially for tissue engineering applications requiring sub-100 nm aligned fibers.
Copyright © 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22789616     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  9 in total

1.  Static and cyclic mechanical loading of mesenchymal stem cells on elastomeric, electrospun polyurethane meshes.

Authors:  Robyn D Cardwell; Jonathan A Kluge; Patrick S Thayer; Scott A Guelcher; Linda A Dahlgren; David L Kaplan; Aaron S Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Current hydrogel advances in physicochemical and biological response-driven biomedical application diversity.

Authors:  Huan Cao; Lixia Duan; Yan Zhang; Jun Cao; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-12-16

3.  Nanofibrous materials affect the reaction of cytotoxicity assays.

Authors:  Rafał Podgórski; Michał Wojasiński; Tomasz Ciach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Strategies to Improve Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Vascular Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Tianyu Yao; Matthew B Baker; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Local delivery of FTY720 induces neutrophil activation through chemokine signaling in an oronasal fistula model.

Authors:  A M Amanso; T C Turner; A Kamalakar; S A Ballestas; L A Hymel; J Randall; R Johnston; R A Arthur; N J Willett; E A Botchwey; S L Goudy
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2021-05-13

6.  Self-Searching Writing of Human-Organ-Scale Three-Dimensional Topographic Scaffolds with Shape Memory by Silkworm-like Electrospun Autopilot Jet.

Authors:  Balchandar Navaneethan; Chia-Fu Chou
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 10.383

7.  A Controlled Design of Aligned and Random Nanofibers for 3D Bi-functionalized Nerve Conduits Fabricated via a Novel Electrospinning Set-up.

Authors:  Jeong In Kim; Tae In Hwang; Ludwig Erik Aguilar; Chan Hee Park; Cheol Sang Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Antibacterial titanium nano-patterned arrays inspired by dragonfly wings.

Authors:  Chris M Bhadra; Vi Khanh Truong; Vy T H Pham; Mohammad Al Kobaisi; Gediminas Seniutinas; James Y Wang; Saulius Juodkazis; Russell J Crawford; Elena P Ivanova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Cellular and Subcellular Contact Guidance on Microfabricated Substrates.

Authors:  Claire Leclech; Catherine Villard
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.