UNLABELLED: CASE HISTORY AND PRESENTATION: Two non-human primates (Macaca fascicularis), weight 3.5 kg, enrolled in an experimental protocol received a 25 μg hour(-1) transdermal fentanyl patch for postoperative analgesia. The following day both animals were clinically normal, but after a new induction of anaesthesia with ketamine, they developed severe and prolonged respiratory distress, profound coma and myosis. MANAGEMENT AND FOLLOW-UP: Attempted reversal with naloxone was ineffective. After several hours of ventilation, both primates eventually died, 7 and 15 hours after ketamine injection, respectively. In both cases, the patch was discovered in the animal's cheek pouch. Subsequent fentanyl serum concentration measurements (8.29 and 14.80 μg L(-1) ) confirmed fentanyl overdose. CONCLUSIONS: This report of two fatal intoxications in non-human primates secondary to ingestion of a transdermal fentanyl patch demonstrates that this method of analgesia is inappropriate for non-human primates, because of their tendency to chew almost anything they can reach.
UNLABELLED: CASE HISTORY AND PRESENTATION: Two non-human primates (Macaca fascicularis), weight 3.5 kg, enrolled in an experimental protocol received a 25 μg hour(-1) transdermal fentanyl patch for postoperative analgesia. The following day both animals were clinically normal, but after a new induction of anaesthesia with ketamine, they developed severe and prolonged respiratory distress, profound coma and myosis. MANAGEMENT AND FOLLOW-UP: Attempted reversal with naloxone was ineffective. After several hours of ventilation, both primates eventually died, 7 and 15 hours after ketamine injection, respectively. In both cases, the patch was discovered in the animal's cheek pouch. Subsequent fentanyl serum concentration measurements (8.29 and 14.80 μg L(-1) ) confirmed fentanyloverdose. CONCLUSIONS: This report of two fatal intoxications in non-human primates secondary to ingestion of a transdermal fentanyl patch demonstrates that this method of analgesia is inappropriate for non-human primates, because of their tendency to chew almost anything they can reach.
Authors: Chiara Zullian; Pablo Lema; Melissa Lavoie; Aurore Dodelet-Devillers; Francis Beaudry; Pascal Vachon Journal: Can J Vet Res Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 1.310
Authors: Gregory W Salyards; Marie-Josee Lemoy; Heather K Knych; Ashley E Hill; Kari L Christe Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Ronald B Moss; Meghan McCabe Pryor; Rebecca Baillie; Katherine Kudrycki; Christina Friedrich; Mike Reed; Dennis J Carlo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 3.240