Literature DB >> 22789080

Human rights accountability for maternal death and failure to provide safe, legal abortion: the significance of two ground-breaking CEDAW decisions.

Eszter Kismödi1, Judith Bueno de Mesquita, Ximena Andión Ibañez, Rajat Khosla, Lilian Sepúlveda.   

Abstract

In 2011, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) issued two landmark decisions. In Alyne da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil, the first maternal death case decided by an international human rights body, it confirms that States have a human rights obligation to guarantee that all women, irrespective of their income or racial background, have access to timely, non-discriminatory, and appropriate maternal health services. In L.C. v. Peru, concerning a 13-year-old rape victim who was denied a therapeutic abortion and had an operation on her spine delayed that left her seriously disabled as a result, it established that the State should guarantee access to abortion when a woman's physical or mental health is in danger, decriminalise abortion when pregnancy results from rape or sexual abuse, review its restrictive interpretation of therapeutic abortion and establish a mechanism to ensure that reproductive rights are understood and observed in all health care facilities. Both cases affirm that accessible and good quality health services are vital to women's human rights and expand States' obligations in relation to these. They also affirm that States must ensure national accountability for sexual and reproductive health rights, and provide remedies and redress in the event of violations. And they reaffirm the importance of international human rights bodies as sources of accountability for sexual and reproductive rights violations, especially where national accountability is absent or ineffective.
Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Health Matters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22789080     DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39610-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health Matters        ISSN: 0968-8080


  5 in total

1.  Why don't humanitarian organizations provide safe abortion services?

Authors:  Therese McGinn; Sara E Casey
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.723

2.  The role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality.

Authors:  Jennifer Templeton Dunn; Katherine Lesyna; Anna Zaret
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  "Better dead than being mocked": an anthropological study on perceptions and attitudes towards unwanted pregnancy and abortion in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Authors:  Doris Burtscher; Catrin Schulte-Hillen; Jean-François Saint-Sauveur; Eva De Plecker; Mohit Nair; Jovana Arsenijević
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2020-12

Review 4.  The emergence of a global right to health norm--the unresolved case of universal access to quality emergency obstetric care.

Authors:  Rachel Hammonds; Gorik Ooms
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2014-02-27

5.  Brazilian adolescents' knowledge and beliefs about abortion methods: a school-based internet inquiry.

Authors:  Ellen M H Mitchell; Silke Heumann; Ana Araujo; Leila Adesse; Carolyn Tucker Halpern
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.