Literature DB >> 22789043

Pharmaceutical companies and global lack of access to medicines: strengthening accountability under the right to health.

Anand Grover1, Brian Citro, Mihir Mankad, Fiona Lander.   

Abstract

Many medicines currently available on the market are simply too expensive for millions around the world to afford. Many medicines available in the developing world are only available to a small percentage of the population due to economic inequities. The profit-seeking behavior of pharmaceutical companies exacerbates this problem. In most cases, the price reductions required to make drugs affordable to a broader class of people in the developing world are not offset by the resultant increase in sales volume. Simply stated, in most of the developing world, it is more profitable to sell drugs to the very wealthy at high prices than it is to sell cheaper drugs to a greater number of people. As a result, medicines remain unaffordable for the vast majority of people in many parts of the world. While this might be an acceptable outcome for certain commodities, such as luxury goods, it is completely unacceptable for life-saving medicines. Therefore, in order to effectively address the global lack of access to medicines, the role pharmaceutical companies play in the international intellectual property regime must be critically examined.
© 2012 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22789043     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00661.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  5 in total

1.  Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: a case study on McDonald's Australia.

Authors:  Julia Anaf; Frances E Baum; Matt Fisher; Elizabeth Harris; Sharon Friel
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 2.  Promise, perils and cautious optimism: the next frontier in long-acting modalities for the treatment and prevention of HIV.

Authors:  Morgan M Philbin; Amaya Perez-Brumer
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Biological diversity in the patent system.

Authors:  Paul Oldham; Stephen Hall; Oscar Forero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  In Defence of informed consent for health record research - why arguments from 'easy rescue', 'no harm' and 'consent bias' fail.

Authors:  Thomas Ploug
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  The independence of medical ethics.

Authors:  Johan Brännmark
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2019-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.