Literature DB >> 22788951

Associations with the Japanese population's preferences for the place of end-of-life care and their need for receiving health care services.

Sakiko Fukui1, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to identify the associations with the Japanese population's preferences for the place of end-of-life care and their need for receiving health care services.
METHODS: A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional nationwide survey was conducted for 2000 randomly selected Japanese people aged 40-79 years.
RESULTS: A total of 1042 people (55%) responded. Regarding preferred place of care, we set the place within the choices of "Home" (preferred by 44% of respondents), "Acute Hospital" (15%), "Palliative Care Unit" (19%), "Public Nursing Home" (10%), and "Private Nursing Home" (2%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the people who preferred "Acute Hospital" tended to have the following need compared to those who preferred "Home," "Palliative Care Unit," or "Nursing Home": higher need for receiving end-of-life care not from its experienced professionals but from the same staff; higher need for using health care services in highly supported environment such as the need for being near health care staff whenever and for receiving treatment possibly until the end; and higher need for consulting nurses whenever. They had lower need for using home care services and daycare services and also lower need for instructing families about how to use insurance/public health services.
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings may help to develop an effective end-of-life care system in Japan considering Japanese people's need for health care services. Also, the results of this study may underscore the importance of education on receiving home care services especially for the people who presently prefer the hospital for end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22788951      PMCID: PMC3438814          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  28 in total

Review 1.  Self-determination and information seeking in end-stage cancer.

Authors:  Margareth S Zanchetta; Shari L Moura
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.027

2.  Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers.

Authors:  K E Steinhauser; N A Christakis; E C Clipp; M McNeilly; L McIntyre; J A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Social services homecare for people with motor neurone disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: why are such services used or refused?

Authors:  Mary R O'Brien; Bridget Whitehead; Philip N Murphy; J Douglas Mitchell; Barbara A Jack
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Hospice or home? Expectations of end-of-life care among white and Chinese older people in the UK.

Authors:  Jane Seymour; Sheila Payne; Alice Chapman; Margaret Holloway
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2007-09

5.  Pediatric residents' clinical and educational experiences with end-of-life care.

Authors:  Megan E McCabe; Elizabeth A Hunt; Janet R Serwint
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Preference of place for end-of-life cancer care and death among bereaved Japanese families who experienced home hospice care and death of a loved one.

Authors:  Jieun Choi; Mitsunori Miyashita; Kei Hirai; Kazuki Sato; Tatsuya Morita; Satoru Tsuneto; Yasuo Shima
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Discharge from a palliative care unit: prevalence and related factors from a retrospective study in Japan.

Authors:  Mitsunori Miyashita; Kazuko Arai; Yosuke Yamada; Machiko Owada; Tomoyo Sasahara; Masako Kawa; Taketo Mukaiyama
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Preference for place of care and place of death in palliative care: are these different questions?

Authors:  M Agar; D C Currow; T M Shelby-James; J Plummer; C Sanderson; A P Abernethy
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.762

9.  Predictors of dying at home for patients receiving nursing services in Japan: A retrospective study comparing cancer and non-cancer deaths.

Authors:  Sumie Ikezaki; Naoki Ikegami
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  A study of home deaths in Japan from 1951 to 2002.

Authors:  Limin Yang; Naoko Sakamoto; Eiji Marui
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.234

View more
  2 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients treated with supportive care alone.

Authors:  Hironori Ashinuma; Masato Shingyoji; Yasushi Yoshida; Meiji Itakura; Toshihiko Iizasa; Yoshihiko Sakashita; Ikuo Sekine
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Going back to home to die: does it make a difference to patient survival?

Authors:  Nozomu Murakami; Kouichi Tanabe; Tatsuya Morita; Shinichi Kadoya; Masanari Shimada; Kaname Ishiguro; Naoki Endo; Koichiro Sawada; Yasunaga Fujikawa; Rumi Takashima; Yoko Amemiya; Hiroyuki Iida; Shiro Koseki; Hatsuna Yasuda; Tatsuhiko Kashii
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.234

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.