BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium leprae was the only known cause of leprosy until 2008, when a new species, named Mycobacterium lepromatosis, was found to cause diffuse lepromatous leprosy (DLL), a unique form of leprosy endemic in Mexico. METHODS: We sought to differentiate the leprosy agents among 120 Mexican patients with various clinical forms of leprosy and to compare their relative prevalences and disease features. Archived skin biopsy specimens from these patients were tested for both M. leprae and M. lepromatosis using polymerase chain reaction-based species-specific assays. RESULTS: Etiologic species were confirmed in 87 (72.5%) patients, of whom 55 were infected with M. lepromatosis, 18 with M. leprae, and 14 with both organisms. The endemic regions of each agent differed but overlapped. Patients with M. lepromatosis were younger and were distributed across more states; their clinical diagnoses included DLL (n = 13), lepromatous leprosy (LL) (n = 34), and eight other forms of leprosy. By contrast, the diagnoses of patients with M. leprae did not include DLL but did include LL (n = 15) and three other forms of leprosy. Thus, M. lepromatosis caused DLL specifically (P = 0.023). Patients with M. lepromatosis also showed more variable skin lesions; the extremities were the most common sites of biopsy in these patients. Finally, patients with dual infections manifested all clinical forms and accounted for 16.1% of all species-confirmed cases. CONCLUSIONS: Mycobacterium lepromatosis is another cause of leprosy and is probably more prevalent than M. leprae in Mexico. It mainly causes LL and also specifically DLL. Dual infections caused by both species may occur in endemic areas.
BACKGROUND:Mycobacterium leprae was the only known cause of leprosy until 2008, when a new species, named Mycobacterium lepromatosis, was found to cause diffuse lepromatous leprosy (DLL), a unique form of leprosy endemic in Mexico. METHODS: We sought to differentiate the leprosy agents among 120 Mexican patients with various clinical forms of leprosy and to compare their relative prevalences and disease features. Archived skin biopsy specimens from these patients were tested for both M. leprae and M. lepromatosis using polymerase chain reaction-based species-specific assays. RESULTS: Etiologic species were confirmed in 87 (72.5%) patients, of whom 55 were infected with M. lepromatosis, 18 with M. leprae, and 14 with both organisms. The endemic regions of each agent differed but overlapped. Patients with M. lepromatosis were younger and were distributed across more states; their clinical diagnoses included DLL (n = 13), lepromatous leprosy (LL) (n = 34), and eight other forms of leprosy. By contrast, the diagnoses of patients with M. leprae did not include DLL but did include LL (n = 15) and three other forms of leprosy. Thus, M. lepromatosis caused DLL specifically (P = 0.023). Patients with M. lepromatosis also showed more variable skin lesions; the extremities were the most common sites of biopsy in these patients. Finally, patients with dual infections manifested all clinical forms and accounted for 16.1% of all species-confirmed cases. CONCLUSIONS:Mycobacterium lepromatosis is another cause of leprosy and is probably more prevalent than M. leprae in Mexico. It mainly causes LL and also specifically DLL. Dual infections caused by both species may occur in endemic areas.
Authors: S T Cole; K Eiglmeier; J Parkhill; K D James; N R Thomson; P R Wheeler; N Honoré; T Garnier; C Churcher; D Harris; K Mungall; D Basham; D Brown; T Chillingworth; R Connor; R M Davies; K Devlin; S Duthoy; T Feltwell; A Fraser; N Hamlin; S Holroyd; T Hornsby; K Jagels; C Lacroix; J Maclean; S Moule; L Murphy; K Oliver; M A Quail; M A Rajandream; K M Rutherford; S Rutter; K Seeger; S Simon; M Simmonds; J Skelton; R Squares; S Squares; K Stevens; K Taylor; S Whitehead; J R Woodward; B G Barrell Journal: Nature Date: 2001-02-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Pushpendra Singh; Andrej Benjak; Verena J Schuenemann; Alexander Herbig; Charlotte Avanzi; Philippe Busso; Kay Nieselt; Johannes Krause; Lucio Vera-Cabrera; Stewart T Cole Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Carlos Franco-Paredes; Luis A Marcos; Andrés F Henao-Martínez; Alfonso J Rodríguez-Morales; Wilmer E Villamil-Gómez; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Alexandro Bonifaz Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 26.132