Literature DB >> 22787498

Comparison between clinical disabilities and electrophysiological values in Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A patients with PMP22 duplication.

Young Hwa Kim1, Hwa Kyung Chung, Kee Duk Park, Kyoung-Gyu Choi, Seung-Min Kim, Il-Nam Sunwoo, Young-Chul Choi, Jeong-Geun Lim, Kwang Woo Lee, Kwang-Kuk Kim, Dong Kuk Lee, In Soo Joo, Ki-Han Kwon, Seok Beom Gwon, Jae Hyeon Park, Dae-Seong Kim, Seung Hyun Kim, Woo-Kyung Kim, Bum Chun Suh, Sang-Beom Kim, Nam-Hee Kim, Eun Hee Sohn, Ok-Joon Kim, Hyun Sook Kim, Jung Hee Cho, Sa-Yoon Kang, Chan-Ik Park, Jiyoung Oh, Jong Hyu Shin, Ki Wha Chung, Byung-Ok Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) type 1A (CMT1A) is the demyelinating form of CMT that is significantly associated with PMP22 duplication. Some studies have found that the disease-related disabilities of these patients are correlated with their compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs), while others have suggested that they are related to the nerve conduction velocities. In the present study, we investigated the correlations between the disease-related disabilities and the electrophysiological values in a large cohort of Korean CMT1A patients.
METHODS: We analyzed 167 CMT1A patients of Korean origin with PMP22 duplication using clinical and electrophysiological assessments, including the CMT neuropathy score and the functional disability scale.
RESULTS: Clinical motor disabilities were significantly correlated with the CMAPs but not the motor nerve conduction velocities (MNCVs). Moreover, the observed sensory impairments matched the corresponding reductions in the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) but not with slowing of the sensory nerve conduction velocities (SNCVs). In addition, CMAPs were strongly correlated with the disease duration but not with the age at onset. The terminal latency index did not differ between CMT1A patients and healthy controls.
CONCLUSIONS: In CMT1A patients, disease-related disabilities such as muscle wasting and sensory impairment were strongly correlated with CMAPs and SNAPs but not with the MNCVs or SNCVs. Therefore, we suggest that the clinical disabilities of CMT patients are determined by the extent of axonal dysfunction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMT1A; charcot-marie-tooth disease; compound muscle action potential; duplication; nerve conduction velocity; sensory nerve action potential

Year:  2012        PMID: 22787498      PMCID: PMC3391619          DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.2.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurol        ISSN: 1738-6586            Impact factor:   3.077


Introduction

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is the most common hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy, and CMT type 1A (CMT1A) neuropathy, which is the most common type of CMT, is subject to a gene dosage effect.1 The primary genetic cause of CMT1A is a duplication of PMP22 resulting from the unequal crossover between two homologous repetitive elements that flank the 1.4-Mb region of chromosome 17p12.2 A new mechanism responsible for the outbreak of CMT1A-which is related to a nonrecurrent rearrangement has recently been reported.3 CMT1A is also caused by a point mutation in PMP22.4 Abnormal axon-Schwann cell interactions cause abnormalities in axonal structure and function, but the exact pathogenic mechanism causing CMT1A is unknown.5 One obvious possibility is that the weakness and sensory loss are the result of axonal degeneration; secondary axonal degeneration is common in CMT1A patients, and its degree determines the patient's functional disability.6 This finding is consistent with the electrophysiological and clinical findings in patients with CMT1A and in several animal models of demyelinating neuropathy.7,8 Axonal dysfunction induced by demyelinating Schwann cells can also occur without axonal degeneration.9 The relationship between motor nerve conduction velocities (MNCVs) and disease disabilities has been the subject of much debate.10-14 Most CMT1A research groups have found a relatively weak correlation between the severity of muscle weakness and nerve conduction velocities,10-12 although some have noted that patients with slower velocities developed more weakness.13,14 Moreover, longitudinal studies have shown that the velocities remained unchanged over decades, whereas the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes decreased.15,16 However, the relationship between MNCVs, CMAPs, and the disease severity has not been investigated in Koreans. Therefore, we determined whether there is a correlation between clinical disabilities and electrophysiological values in Korean CMT1A patients with PMP22 duplication.

Methods

Patients

We enrolled 167 CMT1A patients (93 males, 74 females) with PMP22 duplication who took part in nerve conduction studies at 20 university hospitals in Korea. We excluded CMT1A patients with a partial duplication or a PMP22 point mutation. All of the participants provided written informed consent to participate. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of the Ewha Womans University Hospital.

Clinical assessments

The patients' clinical information was obtained and analyzed, including assessment of the gender ratio, age at onset, disease duration, motor and sensory impairment, deep tendon reflex, and muscle atrophy. The age at onset was determined by asking the patients when their symptoms-such as distal muscle weakness, foot deformity and/or sensory change-first appeared. Sensory impairments were determined according to the severity of pain and vibration. The impairment and progression of CMT was evaluated in these patients using two scales: the functional disability scale (FDS)13 and the CMT neuropathy score (CMTNS).17 Disease severity was quantified for each patient using a 9-point FDS based on the following criteria: 0, normal; 1, normal but with cramps and fatigability; 2, unable to run; 3, difficulty walking but still able to walk unaided; 4, walking with a cane; 5, walking with crutches; 6, walking with a walking frame; 7, wheelchair bound; and 8, bedridden. In addition, we determined the CMTNS based on the motor and sensory symptoms, and according to the pain and vibration, muscle strength, and neurophysiologic test results. The scores of this test were used to divide the patients into two groups: mild (0

Electrophysiological studies

The MNCVs and sensory nerve conduction velocities (SNCVs) for the median, ulnar, peroneal, tibial, and sural nerves were determined in all 167 patients. The recordings were obtained by standard methods using surface stimulation and recording electrodes. The MNCVs of the median and ulnar nerves were determined by stimulating at the elbow and wrist, respectfully, while CMAPs were recorded over the abductor pollicis brevis and the adductor digiti quinti, respectively. The MNCVs of the peroneal and tibial nerves were determined by stimulating at the knee and ankle while recording the CMAPs over the extensor digitorum brevis and adductor hallucis, respectively. The SNCVs and sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were obtained over a finger-wrist segment from the median and ulnar nerves, and they were also recorded for the sural nerves. The terminal latency indices (TLIs) that adjust the distal motor latency for the terminal distance and the proximal MNCV were calculated. The calculated TLI was compared to the TLI of the normal population as reported previously.18 TLIs were calculated for the median nerves as follows: TLI=terminal distance (mm)/[MNCV (ms)×distal motor latency (ms)].

Statistical analyses

The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows, Ver. 11.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Percentages and means were compared by the chi-square test and Student's t-test, respectively. Correlations were determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), and probability values of p<0.05 were considered to be indicative of statistical significance.

Results

Clinical manifestations

The mean age at examination was 36.9 years (range, 5-75 ye-ars) and the mean age at onset was 15.5 years (range, 2-45 years). The mean disease duration at the time of examination was 22.3 years (range, 0-57 years). The disease had manifested before the second decade of life in 69% of the patients. Twelve individuals (7%) with PMP22 duplication did not complain of any clinical symptoms. Muscle weakness and atrophy started predominantly in the distal legs, with these symptoms being noted to a lesser extent in the distal upper limbs. The paresis in the distal regions of the lower limbs varied from asymptomatic to severe weakness. Pinprick sensory loss was found in 87 (52%) patients, and proprioception loss was found in 112 (67%). The mean FDS score was 2.0 and the mean CMTNS was 11.0. Heel gait defects occurred more commonly than toe gait defects (p<0.001), and high-arched foot deformities were common (89%).

Electrophysiological findings

Both the MNCV and SNCV of the median nerve were uniformly reduced in the CMT1A patients. The CMAP of the median nerve was significantly correlated with the disease duration (Fig. 1A; p<0.001) and the CMAP of the ulnar nerve (Fig. 1B; p<0.01). However, no correlations were found between the age at onset and the CMAPs in the median and ulnar nerves (Fig. 1C, D). The TLIs were distributed over a narrow range of values.
Fig. 1

Scattergrams showing results of correlation analysis. The median (A) and ulnar (B) nerve compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were strongly correlated with the disease duration. Closed and open circles indicate male and female patients, respectively. The median (C) and ulnar (D) nerve CMAPs were not correlated with the age at onset.

The TLI of the patients' median nerve (0.31±0.10, mean±SD; range, 0.13-0.72) did not differ significantly from the normal values seen in healthy control subjects (0.31±0.04; range, 0.23-0.43). These results suggest that demyelination in CMT1A patients is uniformly distributed between the proximal and distal portions of the nerves.

Comparison between the mild CMTNS group and the moderate or severe CMTNS group

The characteristics of the mild (0patients in the moderate or severe CMTNS group were more severely affected than those of the mild CMTNS group by muscle weakness (p<0.001), muscle atrophy (p<0.001), sensory loss (p<0.001), the frequency of areflexia (upper, p<0.001; lower, p<0.01), heel and toe gait defects (p<0.001), and foot deformity (p<0.05). The amplitudes of the evoked median nerve motor responses were more severely affected in the moderate or severe CMTNS group than in the mild CMTNS group. In contrast, neither the MNCVs nor the SNCVs differed significantly between the two groups.
Table 1

Comparison between the mild Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) neuropathy score (CMTNS) group versus the moderate or severe CMTNS group of CMT1A patients

Data are either n (%) or mean±SD values.

*p<0.05, †p<0.01, ‡p<0.001.

CMAP: compound muscle action potential, MNCV: motor nerve conduction velocity, SNAP: sensory nerve action potential, SNCV: sensory nerve conduction velocity, SD: standard deviation.

Correlation between disabilities and electrophysiological values

The CMAPs of the median (p<0.001), ulnar (p<0.001), peroneal (p<0.05), and tibial (p<0.001) nerves were significantly correlated with the CMTNS, and the CMAPs of the median (p<0.001), ulnar (p<0.001), peroneal (p<0.05), and tibial (p<0.001) nerves were correlated with the FDS score (Table 2). In contrast, the MNCV of the median nerve was only correlated with the CMTNS (p<0.05). The SNAPs and SNCVs of the median, ulnar, and sural nerves were not correlated with the disability scores.
Table 2

Correlation between disabilities and electrophysiological features

CMAP: compound muscle action potential, CMTNS: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease neuropathy score, FDS: functional disability scale, MNCV: motor nerve conduction velocitiy, ns: not significant, SNAP: sensory nerve action potential, SNCV: sensory nerve conduction velocitiy.

Discussion

The present study investigated the correlations between disease disabilities and the electrophysiological findings in Korean CMT1A patients with PMP22 duplication, and found that the disabilities were related to the CMAPs rather than to the NCVs. It has been reported that CMT symptoms progress due to axonal degeneration and loss,5,19 with axonal loss being the major cause of impairment and disability in patients with CMT1A.20 The accentuation of muscle wasting and sensory impairment in the distal extremities was correlated with the corresponding reduction in the CMAPs and SNAPs but not with the decrease in MNCV or SNCV.10-12 Our results support the hypothesis that the disease-related disabilities are correlated with the decreased nerve action potentials rather than the conduction velocities. It is important to determine how the demyelination of Sch-wann cells causes axonal injury, but this remains elusive.21 Many hypotheses have been postulated.22-25 For example, local biochemical changes in axons, such as decreased neurofilament phosphorylation, increased neurofilament density, and decreased axonal transport due to demyelinating Schwann cells, could lead to axonal dysfunction and eventual axonal loss.9 Some longitudinal CMT studies have revealed that nerve conduction velocities remain unchanged for more than 10 years, but that the CMAPs progressively decrease over the same period.16,26 In the present study we also found an absence of velocity changes over a 10-year period in nine patients despite gradually increasing clinical severities. These results suggest that the degree of change in CMAP amplitude is useful for predicting the clinical severity of the disease. As a marker of axonal loss, the reduction in CMAP amplitude appears to be more closely linked with the disability. We also found that the clinical manifestations of muscle atrophy were also strongly correlated with the CMAPs and axonal loss, which became more pronounced as the disease progressed. The disease severity varies considerably among patients with CMT1A.27 Attempts to identify the mitigating factors are underway, and these efforts could lead to effective therapeutic approaches for reducing the expression of PMP22.28 PMP22 duplication mainly induces a demyelinating phenotype, while the features of axonal pathology appear concomitantly with advancing age.6 The patients with PMP22 duplication show a great variability of disease severity, ranging from asymptomatic individuals to wheelchair-bound patients. These results suggest that other molecular, endogenous, and environmental factors (e.g., genetic factors related to the PMP22 expression) influence the progression of this disease. In the present study, the age at onset was the first decade in 44% of the CMT1A patients and before 20 years of age in 69%. The age at onset as an indicator of the CMT disease severity has been the subject of debate.11,12,26 Although Birouk et al.13 reported an association between the age at onset and the severity of the disorder, others have suggested that the age at onset is not a reliable indicator of disease severity; the latter is consistent with our findings.11,26 Instead, one of the most important disease-modifying factors in our study appeared to be the disease duration. A longitudinal study found that axonal involvement progressed in a time-dependent manner, and that axonal degeneration proceeded concomitantly with advancing disease.10,16 The age-dependent reduction in the CMAPs, and the increase in axonal degeneration and clinical disability observed in our study were also in good agreement with previous reports.15,29 Furthermore, the median nerve TLI did not differ between Korean CMT1A patients and healthy controls. Despite the distal location of the CMT symptoms, the nerve conduction velocities slowed uniformly along the proximal and distal segments, which implies a uniform pathological process of demyelination. In conclusion, a significant correlation was found between the clinical-electrophysiological manifestations and the physical disabilities among the Korean CMT1A patients in this study. Although our study was cross-sectional in design and involved only a single race, we propose that the clinical disease severity in patients with CMT1A is determined by the extent of axonal dysfunction.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Hereditary predominantly motor neuropathies.

Authors:  Davide Pareyson; Chiara Marchesi; Ettore Salsano
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 2.  Demyelinating and axonal features of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with mutations of myelin-related proteins (PMP22, MPZ and Cx32): a clinicopathological study of 205 Japanese patients.

Authors:  Naoki Hattori; Masahiko Yamamoto; Tsuyoshi Yoshihara; Haruki Koike; Masanori Nakagawa; Hiroo Yoshikawa; Akio Ohnishi; Kiyoshi Hayasaka; Osamu Onodera; Masayuki Baba; Hitoshi Yasuda; Toyokazu Saito; Kenji Nakashima; Jun-ichi Kira; Ryuji Kaji; Nobuyuki Oka; Gen Sobue
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Clinical and electrophysiological aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  D Pareyson; V Scaioli; M Laurà
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Distal axonopathy in peripheral nerves of PMP22-mutant mice.

Authors:  S Sancho; J P Magyar; A Aguzzi; U Suter1
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Reliability and validity of the CMT neuropathy score as a measure of disability.

Authors:  M E Shy; J Blake; K Krajewski; D R Fuerst; M Laura; A F Hahn; J Li; R A Lewis; M Reilly
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Mechanisms for nonrecurrent genomic rearrangements associated with CMT1A or HNPP: rare CNVs as a cause for missing heritability.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Pavel Seeman; Pengfei Liu; Marian A J Weterman; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Charles F Towne; Sat Dev Batish; Els De Vriendt; Peter De Jonghe; Bernd Rautenstrauss; Klaus-Henning Krause; Mehrdad Khajavi; Jan Posadka; Antoon Vandenberghe; Francesc Palau; Lionel Van Maldergem; Frank Baas; Vincent Timmerman; James R Lupski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Neurological dysfunction and axonal degeneration in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A.

Authors:  K M Krajewski; R A Lewis; D R Fuerst; C Turansky; S R Hinderer; J Garbern; J Kamholz; M E Shy
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Neuropathy progression in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A.

Authors:  M E Shy; L Chen; E R Swan; R Taube; K M Krajewski; D Herrmann; R A Lewis; M P McDermott
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  The clinical features of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy types I and II.

Authors:  A E Harding; P K Thomas
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Association with a spontaneous point mutation in the PMP22 gene.

Authors:  B B Roa; C A Garcia; U Suter; D A Kulpa; C A Wise; J Mueller; A A Welcher; G J Snipes; E M Shooter; P I Patel; J R Lupski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-07-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Studying cerebellar dysfunction in neuropathy-related tremor.

Authors:  Sheng-Han Kuo; Elan D Louis
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Severe phenotypes in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A patient with PMP22 triplication.

Authors:  Sung Min Kim; Jinho Lee; Bo Ram Yoon; Ye Jin Kim; Byung-Ok Choi; Ki Wha Chung
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 3.  New evidence for secondary axonal degeneration in demyelinating neuropathies.

Authors:  Kathryn R Moss; Taylor S Bopp; Anna E Johnson; Ahmet Höke
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Segregation analysis in families with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease allows reclassification of putative disease causing mutations.

Authors:  Rune Østern; Toril Fagerheim; Helene Hjellnes; Bjørn Nygård; Svein Ivar Mellgren; Øivind Nilssen
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.103

5.  Clinical and Pathological Variation of Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A in a Large Chinese Cohort.

Authors:  Rui Wu; He Lv; Wei Zhang; Zhaoxia Wang; Yuehuan Zuo; Jing Liu; Yun Yuan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Nine-hole Peg Test and Ten-meter Walk Test for Evaluating Functional Loss in Chinese Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

Authors:  Hui-Xia Niu; Rui-Hao Wang; Hong-Liang Xu; Bo Song; Jing Yang; Chang-He Shi; Yu-Sheng Li; Bing-Qian Zhang; Shao-Ping Wang; Quan Yong; Yuan-Yuan Wang; Yu-Ming Xu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Paternal gender specificity and mild phenotypes in Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A patients with de novo 17p12 rearrangements.

Authors:  Ah J Lee; Da E Nam; Yu J Choi; Seung W Noh; Soo H Nam; Hye J Lee; Seung J Kim; Gyun J Song; Byung-Ok Choi; Ki W Chung
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.183

8.  One PMP22/MPZ and Three MFN2/GDAP1 Concomitant Variants Occurred in a Cohort of 189 Chinese Charcot-Marie-Tooth Families.

Authors:  Yongzhi Xie; Zhiqiang Lin; Xiaobo Li; Lei Liu; Shunxiang Huang; Huadong Zhao; Binghao Wang; Wanqian Cao; Zhengmao Hu; Jifeng Guo; Lu Shen; Beisha Tang; Ruxu Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.