Literature DB >> 22787286

Treatment of sound errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity.

E Maas1, J Barlow, D Robin, L Shapiro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent research suggests that the complexity of treatment stimuli influences the effectiveness of treatment. However, no studies have examined the role of complexity on sound production treatment in adult individuals with sound production impairments. AIMS: This study examines effects of syllable complexity on treatment outcome in two patients with acquired sound production problems. Complexity is defined in terms of syllable structure: clusters are more complex than singletons. Using a single-subject multiple-baseline design, we address the question: Is treatment of complex syllables more effective than treatment of simple syllables? METHODS #ENTITYSTARTX00026; PROCEDURES: Two patients with aphasia and apraxia of speech were trained to produce complex or simple syllables (using modelling). Improvement was measured by percent correct on a word and nonword repetition test. OUTCOMES #ENTITYSTARTX00026;
RESULTS: We found that both treatment on simple syllables and treatment on complex syllables led to improved production of simple syllables, while treatment of complex syllables also led to improvement on some complex syllables for one of the two patients.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggests that training complex items is more effective than training simple items, at least for some patients. Possible reasons for lack of stronger effects are discussed, as well as directions for future research.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22787286      PMCID: PMC3392129          DOI: 10.1080/02687030244000266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aphasiology        ISSN: 0268-7038            Impact factor:   2.773


  16 in total

Review 1.  Response generalization in apraxia of speech treatments: taking another look.

Authors:  K J Ballard
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2001 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Syllable onsets: clusters and adjuncts in acquisition.

Authors:  J A Gierut
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Stimulability as a factor in the phonological generalization of misarticulating preschool children.

Authors:  T W Powell; M Elbert; D A Dinnsen
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-12

4.  Complexity in Phonological Treatment: Clinical Factors.

Authors:  Judith A Gierut
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Treatment and generalization of complex sentence production in agrammatism.

Authors:  K J Ballard; C K Thompson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part II: Design selection and arrangement of experimental phases.

Authors:  K P Kearns
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1986-08

7.  Generalization following the remediation of early- and later-developing consonant clusters.

Authors:  T W Powell; M Elbert
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1984-05

8.  On the prediction of phonologic generalization learning patterns.

Authors:  M Elbert; D A Dinnsen; T W Powell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1984-08

9.  A re-evaluation of the short examination for aphasia.

Authors:  H Schuell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1966-05

10.  The role of syntactic complexity in training wh-movement structures in agrammatic aphasia: optimal order for promoting generalization.

Authors:  C K Thompson; K J Ballard; L P Shapiro
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.892

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: the science and the state of the science.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: the complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE).

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Lewis P Shapiro; Swathi Kiran; Jana Sobecks
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS).

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Christina Gildersleeve-Neumann; Kathy J Jakielski; Ruth Stoeckel
Journal:  Curr Dev Disord Rep       Date:  2014-09

4.  Treating apraxia of speech with an implicit protocol that activates speech motor areas via inner speech.

Authors:  Dana Farias; Christine Herrick Davis; Stephen M Wilson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 5.  Speech and nonspeech: What are we talking about?

Authors:  Edwin Maas
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.484

6.  Complexity in language learning and treatment.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Training Pseudoword Reading in Acquired Dyslexia: A Phonological Complexity Approach.

Authors:  Ellyn A Riley; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.773

8.  Articulatory Control in Childhood Apraxia of Speech in a Novel Word-Learning Task.

Authors:  Julie Case; Maria I Grigos
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: Treatment of Underlying Forms.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Lewis P Shapiro
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Training verb argument structure production in agrammatic aphasia: behavioral and neural recovery patterns.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Ellyn A Riley; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Aya Meltzer-Asscher; Sladjana Lukic
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.