BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is considering developing a 30-day ischemic stroke hospital-level mortality model using administrative data. We examined whether inclusion of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), a measure of stroke severity not included in administrative data, would alter 30-day mortality rates in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2562 veterans admitted with ischemic stroke to 64 Veterans Health Administration Hospitals in the fiscal year 2007 were included. First, we examined the distribution of unadjusted mortality rates across the Veterans Health Administration. Second, we estimated 30-day all-cause, risk standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) for each hospital by adjusting for age, sex, and comorbid conditions using hierarchical models with and without the inclusion of the NIHSS. Finally, we examined whether adjustment for the NIHSS significantly changed RSMRs for each hospital compared with other hospitals. The median unadjusted mortality rate was 3.6%. The RSMR interquartile range without the NIHSS ranged from 5.1% to 5.6%. Adjustment with the NIHSS did not change the RSMR interquartile range (5.1%-5.6%). Among veterans ≥65 years, the RSMR interquartile range without the NIHSS ranged from 9.2% to 10.3%. With adjustment for the NIHSS, the RSMR interquartile range changed from 9.4% to 10.0%. The plot of 30-day RSMRs estimated with and without the inclusion of the NIHSS in the model demonstrated overlapping 95% confidence intervals across all hospitals, with no hospital significantly below or above the mean-unadjusted 30-day mortality rate. The 30-day mortality measure did not discriminate well among hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the NIHSS on RSMRs was limited. The small number of stroke admissions and the narrow range of 30-day stroke mortality rates at the facility level in the Veterans Health Administration cast doubt on the value of using 30-day RSMRs as a means of identifying outlier hospitals based on their stroke care quality.
BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is considering developing a 30-day ischemic stroke hospital-level mortality model using administrative data. We examined whether inclusion of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), a measure of stroke severity not included in administrative data, would alter 30-day mortality rates in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2562 veterans admitted with ischemic stroke to 64 Veterans Health Administration Hospitals in the fiscal year 2007 were included. First, we examined the distribution of unadjusted mortality rates across the Veterans Health Administration. Second, we estimated 30-day all-cause, risk standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) for each hospital by adjusting for age, sex, and comorbid conditions using hierarchical models with and without the inclusion of the NIHSS. Finally, we examined whether adjustment for the NIHSS significantly changed RSMRs for each hospital compared with other hospitals. The median unadjusted mortality rate was 3.6%. The RSMR interquartile range without the NIHSS ranged from 5.1% to 5.6%. Adjustment with the NIHSS did not change the RSMR interquartile range (5.1%-5.6%). Among veterans ≥65 years, the RSMR interquartile range without the NIHSS ranged from 9.2% to 10.3%. With adjustment for the NIHSS, the RSMR interquartile range changed from 9.4% to 10.0%. The plot of 30-day RSMRs estimated with and without the inclusion of the NIHSS in the model demonstrated overlapping 95% confidence intervals across all hospitals, with no hospital significantly below or above the mean-unadjusted 30-day mortality rate. The 30-day mortality measure did not discriminate well among hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the NIHSS on RSMRs was limited. The small number of stroke admissions and the narrow range of 30-day stroke mortality rates at the facility level in the Veterans Health Administration cast doubt on the value of using 30-day RSMRs as a means of identifying outlier hospitals based on their stroke care quality.
Authors: Greg Arling; Mathew Reeves; Joseph Ross; Linda S Williams; Salomeh Keyhani; Neale Chumbler; Michael S Phipps; Christianne Roumie; Laura J Myers; Amanda H Salanitro; Diana L Ordin; Jennifer Myers; Dawn M Bravata Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2011-12-06
Authors: Eric E Smith; Nandavar Shobha; David Dai; Daiwai M Olson; Mathew J Reeves; Jeffrey L Saver; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow; Lee H Schwamm Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gregg C Fonarow; Eric E Smith; Mathew J Reeves; Wenqin Pan; Daiwai Olson; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Lee H Schwamm Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Arlene A Schmid; Carolyn K Wells; John Concato; Mary I Dallas; Albert C Lo; Steven E Nadeau; Linda S Williams; Aldo J Peixoto; Mark Gorman; John L Boice; Frederick Struve; Vincent McClain; Dawn M Bravata Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2010
Authors: Dean M Reker; Kimberly Reid; Pamela W Duncan; Clifford Marshall; Diane Cowper; James Stansbury; Kristen L Warr-Wing Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2005 Jan-Feb
Authors: Sudhakar V Nuti; Li Qin; John S Rumsfeld; Joseph S Ross; Frederick A Masoudi; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Karthik Murugiah; Susannah M Bernheim; Lisa G Suter; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jesse D Schold; Nissreen Elfadawy; Laura D Buccini; David A Goldfarb; Stuart M Flechner; Michael P Phelan; Emilio D Poggio Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Peter W Groeneveld; Elina L Medvedeva; Lorrie Walker; Andrea G Segal; Diane M Richardson; Andrew J Epstein Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Christoph Pross; Elke Berger; Martin Siegel; Alexander Geissler; Reinhard Busse Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 2.655