PURPOSE: The quantitative assessment of retinal thickness and volume varies according to the optical coherence tomography (OCT) machine used due to differences in segmentation lines. We describe a novel method of adjusting the segmentation lines of spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) to enable comparison with time-domain OCT (TD-OCT), and assess factors affecting its accuracy. METHODS: In a prospective study, SD-OCT (Spectralis OCT) and TD-OCT (Stratus OCT) were sequentially performed on 200 eyes of 100 healthy individuals. Central retinal thickness (CRT), central point thickness (CPT), and 1-mm volume of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid were compared between the two machines. The segmentation lines on SD-OCT were manually adjusted by a trained operator and the parameters compared again with TD-OCT. RESULTS: The mean CRTs of Spectralis and Stratus were significantly different (268.2 μm vs. 193.9 μm, P < 0.001). After adjustment of segmentation lines, the mean adjusted Spectralis CRT was 197.3 μm, with the difference between SD-OCT and TD-OCT measurements decreasing from 74.3 μm to 3.4 μm (P < 0.001). The difference between the adjusted Spectralis and Stratus CRTs was smallest for high myopes (≤ -6.0 diopters [D]) compared with those with moderate and low myopia (1.5 μm vs. 3.5 μm and 4.6 μm, respectively; P < 0.001). Similar trends were obtained for central 1-mm volumes and CPT. Interoperator and intraoperator repeatability for adjustment of the segmentation lines were good, with an intraclass correlation of 0.99 for both. CONCLUSIONS: Manual adjustment of SD-OCT segmentation lines reliably achieves retinal thickness and volume measurements that are comparable to that of TD-OCT. This is valuable to allow comparisons in multicenter clinical trials where different OCT machines may be used.
PURPOSE: The quantitative assessment of retinal thickness and volume varies according to the optical coherence tomography (OCT) machine used due to differences in segmentation lines. We describe a novel method of adjusting the segmentation lines of spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) to enable comparison with time-domain OCT (TD-OCT), and assess factors affecting its accuracy. METHODS: In a prospective study, SD-OCT (Spectralis OCT) and TD-OCT (Stratus OCT) were sequentially performed on 200 eyes of 100 healthy individuals. Central retinal thickness (CRT), central point thickness (CPT), and 1-mm volume of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid were compared between the two machines. The segmentation lines on SD-OCT were manually adjusted by a trained operator and the parameters compared again with TD-OCT. RESULTS: The mean CRTs of Spectralis and Stratus were significantly different (268.2 μm vs. 193.9 μm, P < 0.001). After adjustment of segmentation lines, the mean adjusted Spectralis CRT was 197.3 μm, with the difference between SD-OCT and TD-OCT measurements decreasing from 74.3 μm to 3.4 μm (P < 0.001). The difference between the adjusted Spectralis and Stratus CRTs was smallest for high myopes (≤ -6.0 diopters [D]) compared with those with moderate and low myopia (1.5 μm vs. 3.5 μm and 4.6 μm, respectively; P < 0.001). Similar trends were obtained for central 1-mm volumes and CPT. Interoperator and intraoperator repeatability for adjustment of the segmentation lines were good, with an intraclass correlation of 0.99 for both. CONCLUSIONS: Manual adjustment of SD-OCT segmentation lines reliably achieves retinal thickness and volume measurements that are comparable to that of TD-OCT. This is valuable to allow comparisons in multicenter clinical trials where different OCT machines may be used.