Literature DB >> 22786830

Menopausal hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.

Heidi D Nelson1, Miranda Walker, Bernadette Zakher, Jennifer Mitchell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Menopausal hormone therapy to prevent chronic conditions is currently not recommended because of its adverse effects.
PURPOSE: To update evidence about the effectiveness of hormone therapy in reducing risk for chronic conditions and adverse effects, and to examine whether outcomes vary among women in different subgroups. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (January 2002 to November 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through the 3rd quarter of 2011), Scopus, and reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of menopausal hormone therapy published in English since 2002 that assessed primary prevention of chronic conditions. DATA EXTRACTION: Investigators extracted data on participants, study design, analysis, follow-up, and results; 2 investigators independently rated study quality by using established criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: 9 fair-quality trials met the inclusion criteria. The Women's Health Initiative reported most of the results, had 11 years of follow-up, and had data most applicable to postmenopausal women in the United States. It showed that estrogen plus progestin therapy reduced fractures (46 fewer per 10 000 woman-years) and increased invasive breast cancer (8 more per 10 000 woman-years), stroke (9 more per 10 000 woman-years), deep venous thrombosis (12 more per 10 000 woman-years), pulmonary embolism (9 more per 10 000 woman-years), lung cancer death (5 more per 10 000 woman-years), gallbladder disease (20 more per 10 000 woman-years), dementia (22 more per 10 000 woman-years), and urinary incontinence (872 more per 10 000 woman-years). Estrogen-only therapy reduced fractures (56 fewer per 10 000 woman-years), invasive breast cancer (8 fewer per 10 000 woman-years), and death (2 fewer per 10 000 woman-years) and increased stroke (11 more per 10 000 woman-years), deep venous thrombosis (7 more per 10 000 woman-years), gallbladder disease (33 more per 10 000 woman-years), and urinary incontinence (1271 more per 10 000 woman-years). Outcomes did not consistently differ by age or comorbid conditions. LIMITATION: Limitations of the trials included low adherence, high attrition, inadequate power to detect risks for some outcomes, and evaluation of few regimens.
CONCLUSION: Estrogen plus progestin and estrogen alone decreased risk for fractures but increased risk for stroke, thromboembolic events, gallbladder disease, and urinary incontinence. Estrogen plus progestin increased risk for breast cancer and probable dementia, whereas estrogen alone decreased risk for breast cancer. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22786830     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  27 in total

1.  Relationship between bone cross-sectional area and indices of peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Claudio Pedone; Simone Scarlata; Nicola Napoli; Fulvio Lauretani; Stefania Bandinelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Body mass index and breast cancer risk according to postmenopausal estrogen-progestin use and hormone receptor status.

Authors:  Mark F Munsell; Brian L Sprague; Donald A Berry; Gary Chisholm; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 3.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy and cognition.

Authors:  Anna C McCarrey; Susan M Resnick
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 4.  The cerebellum as a target for estrogen action.

Authors:  Valerie L Hedges; Timothy J Ebner; Robert L Meisel; Paul G Mermelstein
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 5.  Age-related differences in cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury: effects of estrogen deficiency.

Authors:  Donna H Korzick; Timothy S Lancaster
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Ellen S O'Meara; Karla Kerlikowske; Steven Balch; Diana Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and cardiovascular events in participants who used vaginal estrogen in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Kathleen M Hovey; Christopher A Andrews; Rowan T Chlebowski; Marcia L Stefanick; Dorothy S Lane; Jan Shifren; Chu Chen; Andrew M Kaunitz; Jane A Cauley; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy: risks and benefits.

Authors:  Serge Rozenberg; Jean Vandromme; Caroline Antoine
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 9.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy is not associated with risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jacqueline O'Brien; John W Jackson; Francine Grodstein; Deborah Blacker; Jennifer Weuve
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Low-dose bisphenol A and estrogen increase ventricular arrhythmias following ischemia-reperfusion in female rat hearts.

Authors:  Sujuan Yan; Weizhong Song; Yamei Chen; Kui Hong; Jack Rubinstein; Hong-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 6.023

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.