Literature DB >> 22786817

Asociality and engagement in adult offenders in substance abuse treatment.

Jennifer Pankow1, Kevin Knight.   

Abstract

In therapeutic community models for drug treatment, individual recovery is principally structured around group meetings and positive peer influences. Research shows that asocial group members with resistant behaviors and attitudes are at risk for poor treatment outcomes and have the potential to adversely impact the therapeutic group. To gain a better understanding of the asocial client's role in the larger treatment process, in-prison treatment data were used: (1) to model and confirm a two-factor solution of asociality consistent with the literature, and (2) to examine the relationship between asocial clients and treatment engagement for validation of the two-factor model. Exploratory analysis resulted in a three-factor solution representing behavioral responsivity, cognitive distortion, and social disassociation dimensions. Nested ANOVA (i.e., clients nested within prison programs) demonstrated that asocial levels (low, medium, and high risk) predicted treatment engagement. Furthermore, comparisons among asocial risk levels indicated that high asocial clients reported significantly lower engagement levels when compared with low and medium asocial clients.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22786817      PMCID: PMC7444426          DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Sci Law        ISSN: 0735-3936


  14 in total

1.  Self-reported psychopathy: a validation study.

Authors:  D R Lynam; S Whiteside; S Jones
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1999-08

2.  A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomes.

Authors:  D Dwayne Simpson
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2004-09

3.  Factor structure of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI): findings from a large incarcerated sample.

Authors:  Craig S Neumann; Melanie B Malterer; Joseph P Newman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2008-06

4.  Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy.

Authors:  R D Hare
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1985-02

5.  Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population.

Authors:  M R Levenson; K A Kiehl; C M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-01

6.  Texas Christian University (TCU) Short Forms for Assessing Client Needs and Functioning in Addiction Treatment.

Authors:  D Dwayne Simpson; George W Joe; Kevin Knight; Grace A Rowan-Szal; Julie S Gray
Journal:  J Offender Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-07

7.  Sociopathy and psychotherapy outcome.

Authors:  G E Woody; A T McLellan; L Luborsky; C P O'Brien
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1985-11

8.  The Personality Assessment Inventory as a proxy for the Psychopathy Checklist Revised: testing the incremental validity and cross-sample robustness of the Antisocial Features Scale.

Authors:  Kevin S Douglas; Laura S Guy; John F Edens; Douglas P Boer; Jennine Hamilton
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2007-09

9.  Intensive analysis of therapeutic factors and outcome in long-term inpatient groups.

Authors:  V Tschuschke; R R Dies
Journal:  Int J Group Psychother       Date:  1994-04

Review 10.  Structural models of psychopathy.

Authors:  Robert D Hare; Craig S Neumann
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.