Literature DB >> 22786659

Tailoring sparse multivariable regression techniques for prognostic single-nucleotide polymorphism signatures.

H Binder1, A Benner, L Bullinger, M Schumacher.   

Abstract

When seeking prognostic information for patients, modern technologies provide a huge amount of genomic measurements as a starting point. For single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), there may be more than one million covariates that need to be simultaneously considered with respect to a clinical endpoint. Although the underlying biological problem cannot be solved on the basis of clinical cohorts of only modest size, some important SNPs might still be identified. Sparse multivariable regression techniques have recently become available for automatically identifying prognostic molecular signatures that comprise relatively few covariates and provide reasonable prediction performance. For illustrating how such approaches can be adapted to the specific features of SNP data, we propose different variants of a component-wise likelihood-based boosting approach. The latter links SNP measurements to a time-to-event endpoint by a regression model that is built up in a large number of steps. The variants allow for strategic choices in dealing with SNPs that differ in variance because of their variation in minor allele frequencies. In addition, we propose a heuristic that allows computationally efficient handling of millions of covariates, thus opening the door for incorporating SNP × treatment interactions. We illustrate this using data from patients with acute myeloid leukemia. We judge the resulting models according to prediction error curves and using resampling data sets. We obtain increased stability by moving interpretation from the SNP to the gene level. By considering these different aspects, we outline a more general strategy for linking SNP measurements to a time-to-event endpoint by means of sparse multivariable regression models.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22786659     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  SurvBenchmark: comprehensive benchmarking study of survival analysis methods using both omics data and clinical data.

Authors:  Yunwei Zhang; Germaine Wong; Graham Mann; Samuel Muller; Jean Y H Yang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 7.658

2.  Tumor heterogeneity estimation for radiomics in cancer.

Authors:  Ani Eloyan; Mun Sang Yue; Davit Khachatryan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A weighting approach for judging the effect of patient strata on high-dimensional risk prediction signatures.

Authors:  Veronika Weyer; Harald Binder
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Transforming RNA-Seq data to improve the performance of prognostic gene signatures.

Authors:  Isabella Zwiener; Barbara Frisch; Harald Binder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identifying Prognostic SNPs in Clinical Cohorts: Complementing Univariate Analyses by Resampling and Multivariable Modeling.

Authors:  Stefanie Hieke; Axel Benner; Richard F Schlenk; Martin Schumacher; Lars Bullinger; Harald Binder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A multivariable approach for risk markers from pooled molecular data with only partial overlap.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Stelzer; Livia Maccioni; Aslihan Gerhold-Ay; Karin E Smedby; Martin Schumacher; Alexandra Nieters; Harald Binder
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.103

7.  Identification of Genetic Predispositions Related to Ionizing Radiation in Primary Human Skin Fibroblasts From Survivors of Childhood and Second Primary Cancer as Well as Cancer-Free Controls: Protocol for the Nested Case-Control Study KiKme.

Authors:  Manuela Marron; Lara Kim Brackmann; Heike Schwarz; Willempje Hummel-Bartenschlager; Sebastian Zahnreich; Danuta Galetzka; Iris Schmitt; Christian Grad; Philipp Drees; Johannes Hopf; Johanna Mirsch; Peter Scholz-Kreisel; Peter Kaatsch; Alicia Poplawski; Moritz Hess; Harald Binder; Thomas Hankeln; Maria Blettner; Heinz Schmidberger
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-11-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.