QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: Effective health promotion is of great importance from clinical as well as from public health perspectives and therefore should be encouraged. Especially regarding health promotion in the elderly, general practitioners (GPs) have a key role. Nevertheless, evidence suggests a lack of health promotion by GPs, especially in this age group. The aim of our study was to assess self-perceived attitudes, barriers and facilitators of GPs to provide health promotion in the elderly. METHODS: We performed a qualitative focus group study with 37 general practitioners. The focus group interviews were recorded digitally, transcribed literally and analysed with ATLAS.ti, a software program for qualitative text analysis. RESULTS: Among the participating GPs, definitions of health promotion varied widely and the opinions regarding its effectiveness were very heterogeneous. The two most important self-perceived barriers for GPs to provide health promotion in the elderly were lack of time and insufficient reimbursement for preventive and health promotion advice. As intervention to increase health promotion in the elderly, GPs suggested, for example, integration of health promotion into under and postgraduate training. Changes at the practice level such as involving the practice nurse in health promotion and counselling were discussed very controversially. CONCLUSION: Health promotion, especially in the elderly, is crucial but in the opinion of the GPs we involved in our study, there is a gap between public health requirements and the reimbursement system. Integration of health promotion in medical education may be needed to increase knowledge as well as attitudes of GPs regarding this issue.
QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: Effective health promotion is of great importance from clinical as well as from public health perspectives and therefore should be encouraged. Especially regarding health promotion in the elderly, general practitioners (GPs) have a key role. Nevertheless, evidence suggests a lack of health promotion by GPs, especially in this age group. The aim of our study was to assess self-perceived attitudes, barriers and facilitators of GPs to provide health promotion in the elderly. METHODS: We performed a qualitative focus group study with 37 general practitioners. The focus group interviews were recorded digitally, transcribed literally and analysed with ATLAS.ti, a software program for qualitative text analysis. RESULTS: Among the participating GPs, definitions of health promotion varied widely and the opinions regarding its effectiveness were very heterogeneous. The two most important self-perceived barriers for GPs to provide health promotion in the elderly were lack of time and insufficient reimbursement for preventive and health promotion advice. As intervention to increase health promotion in the elderly, GPs suggested, for example, integration of health promotion into under and postgraduate training. Changes at the practice level such as involving the practice nurse in health promotion and counselling were discussed very controversially. CONCLUSION: Health promotion, especially in the elderly, is crucial but in the opinion of the GPs we involved in our study, there is a gap between public health requirements and the reimbursement system. Integration of health promotion in medical education may be needed to increase knowledge as well as attitudes of GPs regarding this issue.
Authors: Manuela Bombana; Michel Wensing; Lisa Wittenborn; Charlotte Ullrich Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Maria Rubio-Valera; Mariona Pons-Vigués; María Martínez-Andrés; Patricia Moreno-Peral; Anna Berenguera; Ana Fernández Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sebastià March; Joana Ripoll; Matilde Jordan Martin; Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo; Carmen Belén Benedé Azagra; Lázaro Elizalde Soto; Mª Clara Vidal; María de Lluc Bauzà Amengual; Trinidad Planas Juan; Damiana Maria Pérez Mariano; Micaela Llull Sarralde; Juan Luís Ruiz-Giménez; Rosa Bajo Viñas; Carmen Solano Villarubia; Maria Rodriguez Bajo; Manuela Cordoba Victoria; Marta Badia Capdevila; Elena Serrano Ferrandez; Maria Bosom Diumenjo; Isabel Montaner-Gomis; Buenaventura Bolibar-Ribas; Angel Antoñanzas Lombarte; Samantha Bregel Cotaina; Ana Calvo Tocado; Barbara Olivan Blázquez; Rosa Magallon Botaya; Pilar Marín Palacios; Margarita Echauri Ozcoidi; María Jose Perez-Arauta; Joan Llobera; Maria Ramos Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-10-08 Impact factor: 2.692