Literature DB >> 22786588

Machine learning algorithms to classify spinal muscular atrophy subtypes.

Tuhin Srivastava1, Basil T Darras, Jim S Wu, Seward B Rutkove.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The development of better biomarkers for disease assessment remains an ongoing effort across the spectrum of neurologic illnesses. One approach for refining biomarkers is based on the concept of machine learning, in which individual, unrelated biomarkers are simultaneously evaluated. In this cross-sectional study, we assess the possibility of using machine learning, incorporating both quantitative muscle ultrasound (QMU) and electrical impedance myography (EIM) data, for classification of muscles affected by spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).
METHODS: Twenty-one normal subjects, 15 subjects with SMA type 2, and 10 subjects with SMA type 3 underwent EIM and QMU measurements of unilateral biceps, wrist extensors, quadriceps, and tibialis anterior. EIM and QMU parameters were then applied in combination using a support vector machine (SVM), a type of machine learning, in an attempt to accurately categorize 165 individual muscles.
RESULTS: For all 3 classification problems, normal vs SMA, normal vs SMA 3, and SMA 2 vs SMA 3, use of SVM provided the greatest accuracy in discrimination, surpassing both EIM and QMU individually. For example, the accuracy, as measured by the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) for the SVM discriminating SMA 2 muscles from SMA 3 muscles was 0.928; in comparison, the ROC-AUCs for EIM and QMU parameters alone were only 0.877 (p < 0.05) and 0.627 (p < 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining EIM and QMU data categorizes individual SMA-affected muscles with very high accuracy. Further investigation of this approach for classifying and for following the progression of neuromuscular illness is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22786588      PMCID: PMC3400094          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182604395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  20 in total

1.  Electrical impedance myography to assess outcome in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove; Hui Zhang; David A Schoenfeld; Elizabeth M Raynor; Jeremy M Shefner; Merit E Cudkowicz; Anne B Chin; Ronald Aaron; Carl A Shiffman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Muscle ultrasound in the assessment of suspected neuromuscular disease in childhood.

Authors:  S M Zuberi; N Matta; S Nawaz; J B Stephenson; R C McWilliam; A Hollman
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.296

3.  Assessing neuromuscular disease with multifrequency electrical impedance myography.

Authors:  Gregory J Esper; Carl A Shiffman; Ronald Aaron; Kyungmouk S Lee; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Boosting power for clinical trials using classifiers based on multiple biomarkers.

Authors:  Omid Kohannim; Xue Hua; Derrek P Hibar; Suh Lee; Yi-Yu Chou; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Characterizing spinal muscular atrophy with electrical impedance myography.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove; Jeremy M Shefner; Matt Gregas; Hailly Butler; Jayson Caracciolo; Connie Lin; Patricia M Fogerson; Phillip Mongiovi; Basil T Darras
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Assessing spinal muscular atrophy with quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  Jim S Wu; Basil T Darras; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  High-dimensional pattern regression using machine learning: from medical images to continuous clinical variables.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Yong Fan; Priyanka Bhatt; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Electrical impedance myography: Background, current state, and future directions.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Real-time ultrasound imaging of muscles.

Authors:  J Z Heckmatt; N Pier; V Dubowitz
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of muscle disease.

Authors:  J Z Heckmatt; S Leeman; V Dubowitz
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  8 in total

1.  Quantitative muscle ultrasound measures rapid declines over time in children with SMA type 1.

Authors:  Kay W Ng; Anne M Connolly; Craig M Zaidman
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 2.  Machine learning for medical ultrasound: status, methods, and future opportunities.

Authors:  Laura J Brattain; Brian A Telfer; Manish Dhyani; Joseph R Grajo; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

3.  Composite biomarkers for assessing Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an initial assessment.

Authors:  Irina Shklyar; Amy Pasternak; Kush Kapur; Basil T Darras; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  Cross-sectional evaluation of electrical impedance myography and quantitative ultrasound for the assessment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in a clinical trial setting.

Authors:  Seward B Rutkove; Tom R Geisbush; Aleksandar Mijailovic; Irina Shklyar; Amy Pasternak; Nicole Visyak; Jim S Wu; Craig Zaidman; Basil T Darras
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  The neuromuscular impact of symptomatic SMN restoration in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  W Arnold; Vicki L McGovern; Benjamin Sanchez; Jia Li; Kaitlyn M Corlett; Stephen J Kolb; Seward B Rutkove; Arthur H Burghes
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.996

6.  A Machine Learning Approach to the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Or Inbar; Omri Inbar; Ronen Reuveny; Michael J Segel; Hayit Greenspan; Mickey Scheinowitz
Journal:  Pulm Med       Date:  2021-05-31

7.  SMA-MAP: a plasma protein panel for spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Dione T Kobayashi; Jing Shi; Laurie Stephen; Karri L Ballard; Ruth Dewey; James Mapes; Brett Chung; Kathleen McCarthy; Kathryn J Swoboda; Thomas O Crawford; Rebecca Li; Thomas Plasterer; Cynthia Joyce; Wendy K Chung; Petra Kaufmann; Basil T Darras; Richard S Finkel; Douglas M Sproule; William B Martens; Michael P McDermott; Darryl C De Vivo; Michael G Walker; Karen S Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Automated diagnosis of myositis from muscle ultrasound: Exploring the use of machine learning and deep learning methods.

Authors:  Philippe Burlina; Seth Billings; Neil Joshi; Jemima Albayda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.