Literature DB >> 22785393

Intra-individual reaction time variability in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a precursor to dementia?

Andrea Tales1, Ute Leonards, Aline Bompas, Robert J Snowden, Michelle Philips, Gillian Porter, Judy Haworth, Gordon Wilcock, Antony Bayer.   

Abstract

We used an exogenous target detection cueing paradigm to examine whether intra-individual reaction time variability (IIV) or phasic alerting varied significantly between patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) (n = 45) and healthy older adult controls (n = 31) or between those with aMCI who, within a 2.5 year follow-up period, developed dementia (n = 13) and those who did not (n = 26). Neither IIV, nor simple reaction time, differentiated aMCI from healthy aging, indicating that raised IIV and overall response slowing are not general characteristics of aMCI. However, within the aMCI group, IIV did differentiate between those who converted to dementia and those who remained with a diagnosis of aMCI (non-converters), being significantly more variable in those who later developed dementia. Furthermore, there was no difference in IIV between non-converters and healthy controls. High IIV appears related to an increased probability that an individual with aMCI will become demented within 2.5 years, rather than to amnestic dysfunction per se. In contrast, phasic alerting performance significantly differentiated aMCI from healthy aging, but failed to discriminate those with aMCI who developed dementia from those who did not. In addition, those patients with aMCI who did not develop dementia still showed a significantly poorer phasic alerting effect compared to healthy aging. The phasic alerting abnormality in aMCI compared to healthy aging does not appear specifically related to the performance of those patients for whom aMCI represents the prodromal stages of dementia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22785393     DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2012-120505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 1387-2877            Impact factor:   4.472


  20 in total

Review 1.  Intraindividual variability in cortisol: Approaches, illustrations, and recommendations.

Authors:  Suzanne C Segerstrom; Sandra E Sephton; Philip M Westgate
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 2.  Between the Error Bars: How Modern Theory, Design, and Methodology Enrich the Personality-Health Tradition.

Authors:  Suzanne C Segerstrom
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  Personality predictors of cognitive dispersion: A coordinated analysis of data from seven international studies of older adults.

Authors:  Tomiko Yoneda; Alejandra Marroig; Eileen K Graham; Emily C Willroth; Tamlyn Watermeyer; Emorie D Beck; Elizabeth M Zelinski; Chandra A Reynolds; Nancy L Pedersen; Scott M Hofer; Daniel K Mroczek; Graciela Muniz-Terrera
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Within-Individual Variability: An Index for Subtle Change in Neurocognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  David R Roalf; Megan Quarmley; Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton; David A Wolk; Steven E Arnold; Paul J Moberg
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Using Cognitive Intraindividual Variability to Measure Intervention Effectiveness: Results from the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial.

Authors:  Christopher R Brydges; Michelle C Carlson; Ryan M Andrews; George W Rebok; Allison A M Bielak
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  A QTL on chromosome 3q23 influences processing speed in humans.

Authors:  Emma E M Knowles; Samuel R Mathias; Josephine Mollon; Amanda Rodrigue; Marinka M G Koenis; Thomas D Dyer; Harald H H Goring; Joanne E Curran; Rene L Olvera; Ravi Duggirala; Laura Almasy; John Blangero; David C Glahn
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  Sustained attention failures on a 3-min reaction time task is a sensitive marker of dementia.

Authors:  Aurélie L Manuel; David Foxe; Nathan Bradshaw; Nicholas J Cordato; John R Hodges; James R Burrell; Olivier Piguet
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Reaction time and response inhibition in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Luis D Medina; Ellen Woo; Yaneth Rodriguez-Agudelo; Hector Chaparro Maldonado; Dahyun Yi; Giovanni Coppola; Yan Zhou; Helena C Chui; John M Ringman
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Manipulations of the Response-Stimulus Intervals as a Factor Inducing Controlled Amount of Reaction Time Intra-Individual Variability.

Authors:  Paweł Krukow; Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik; Arkadiusz Podkowiński
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-20

10.  Intra-individual reaction time variability in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: gender, processing load and speed factors.

Authors:  Michelle Phillips; Peter Rogers; Judy Haworth; Antony Bayer; Andrea Tales
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.