Literature DB >> 22784534

Demographic change and carbon dioxide emissions.

Brian C O'Neill1, Brant Liddle, Leiwen Jiang, Kirk R Smith, Shonali Pachauri, Michael Dalton, Regina Fuchs.   

Abstract

Relations between demographic change and emissions of the major greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO(2)) have been studied from different perspectives, but most projections of future emissions only partly take demographic influences into account. We review two types of evidence for how CO(2) emissions from the use of fossil fuels are affected by demographic factors such as population growth or decline, ageing, urbanisation, and changes in household size. First, empirical analyses of historical trends tend to show that CO(2) emissions from energy use respond almost proportionately to changes in population size and that ageing and urbanisation have less than proportional but statistically significant effects. Second, scenario analyses show that alternative population growth paths could have substantial effects on global emissions of CO(2) several decades from now, and that ageing and urbanisation can have important effects in particular world regions. These results imply that policies that slow population growth would probably also have climate-related benefits.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22784534     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60958-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  13 in total

1.  Smaller human population in 2100 could importantly reduce the risk of climate catastrophe.

Authors:  Dean Spears
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided?

Authors:  Paul R Ehrlich; Anne H Ehrlich
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Family planning and the post-2015 development agenda.

Authors:  Tricia Petruney; Lucy C Wilson; John Stanback; Willard Cates
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems.

Authors:  Corey J A Bradshaw; Barry W Brook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Optimal Population and Exhaustible Resource Constraints.

Authors:  Nicholas Lawson; Dean Spears
Journal:  J Popul Econ       Date:  2017-09-09

6.  Population ethics and the prospects for fertility policy as climate mitigation policy.

Authors:  Mark Budolfson; Dean Spears
Journal:  J Dev Stud       Date:  2021-06-01

7.  Life-history theory and climate change: resolving population and parental investment paradoxes.

Authors:  Mark Caudell; Robert Quinlan
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  The case for investing in family planning in the Pacific: costs and benefits of reducing unmet need for contraception in Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands.

Authors:  Elissa C Kennedy; Sean Mackesy-Buckley; Sumi Subramaniam; Andreas Demmke; Rufina Latu; Annette Sachs Robertson; Kabwea Tiban; Apisai Tokon; Stanley Luchters
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  To Facilitate or Curb? The Role of Financial Development in China's Carbon Emissions Reduction Process: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  Tiancai Xing; Qichuan Jiang; Xuejiao Ma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Climate change: challenges and opportunities for global health.

Authors:  Jonathan A Patz; Howard Frumkin; Tracey Holloway; Daniel J Vimont; Andrew Haines
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.