Literature DB >> 22784001

Circadian variation of blood pressure is impaired in normotensive pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Hatice Ender Soydinc1, Vedat Davutoglu, Muhammet Erdal Sak, Suleyman Ercan, Mehmet Sıddık Evsen, Hasan Kaya, Muhammed Oylumlu, Hasan Buyukaslan, Ibrahim Sari.   

Abstract

Data about circadian blood pressure (BP) in normotensive patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are lacking. Thus, we sought to compare dipper and nondipper circadian variation of BP profile between normotensive women complicated with GDM and normal pregnant women. Forty-two women with GDM and 33 normal uncomplicated pregnant women who met the entry criteria for the study were enrolled in the study. Twenty-four-hour noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography to measure the left ventricle mass index and diastolic parameters were performed. Nocturnal blood pressure dipping was calculated as follows: (awake BP - sleep BP) × 100/awake BP. Patients with a nocturnal reduction in average daytime systolic BP and diastolic BP of less than 10% were classified as nondippers. Left ventricle mass index was higher in normotensive pregnant women with GDM group than in normal pregnant subjects (101.98 ± 24 g/m(2) vs. 90.67 ± 15 g/m(2), P < .018). Significant nocturnal systolic and diastolic nondippings were observed in GDM groups compared with normal subjects. From diastolic variables, the mitral E velocity and isovolumetric relaxation time were compatible with diastolic dysfunction relaxation abnormalities (P = .003 and P = .015, respectively) in nondipper group. From all confounding factors, only E velocity (P = .002) and diagnosis of GDM (P < .001) were predictive of nondipper circadian variation. This study shows that (i) circadian BP is impaired in normotensive pregnant subjects with GDM, (ii) the left ventricle mass index is higher in pregnant subjects with GDM than in normal pregnant subjects who despite a 24-hour BP are within normal limits, and (iii) in nocturnal nondipper group, the tendency to having diastolic relaxation abnormalities is noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22784001     DOI: 10.3109/10641963.2012.702832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens        ISSN: 1064-1963            Impact factor:   1.749


  3 in total

1.  Effect of various doses of vitamin D supplementation on pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qingying Zhang; Yan Cheng; Mulan He; Tingting Li; Ziwen Ma; Haidong Cheng
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Associations Between Sleep Disorders and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Materno-fetal Consequences.

Authors:  Gabriela Querejeta Roca; Jacquelyne Anyaso; Susan Redline; Natalie A Bello
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Blood Pressure Monitoring and Perinatal Outcomes in Normotensive Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Almudena Lara-Barea; Begoña Sánchez-Lechuga; Álvaro Vidal-Suárez; Ana I Arroba; Fernando Bugatto; Cristina López-Tinoco
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.