| Literature DB >> 22783269 |
Dayakar V Badri1, Jacqueline M Chaparro, Daniel K Manter, Enrico Martinoia, Jorge M Vivanco.
Abstract
The roots of plants secrete compounds as a way to exchange information with organisms living in the soil. Here, we report the involvement of seven root-expressed ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters corresponding to both full and half-size molecules (Atabcg36, Atabcg37, Atabcc5, Atabcf1, Atabcf3, Atnap5, and Atath10) in root exudation processes using Arabidopsis thaliana. Root exuded phytochemicals were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and it was determined that some of the root exudates from the corresponding ABC transporter mutants were significantly different compared to the wild type. For example, Atabcg37 and Atabcc5 secreted higher levels of the phytoalexin camalexin, and Atabcg36 secreted higher levels of organic acids, specifically salicylic acid (SA). Furthermore, we analyzed the root tissue metabolites of these seven ABC transporter mutants and found that the levels of SA, quercetin, and kaempferol glucosides were higher in Atabcg36, which was correlated with higher expression levels of defense genes in the root tissues compared with the wild type. We did not observe significant changes in the root exudates of the half-size transporters except for Atabcf1 that showed lower levels of few organic acids. In summary, full-size transporters are involved in root secretion of phytochemicals.Entities:
Keywords: ABC transporters; defense proteins; disease resistance; phytoalexin; root exudates; salicylic acid
Year: 2012 PMID: 22783269 PMCID: PMC3389762 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
List of ABC transporters and their T-DNA KO mutants used in this study.
| AGI code | New systemic name | Mutant name | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| At1g59870 | Salk_000578 ( | Kobae et al. ( | |
| Salk_142256 ( | Kobae et al. ( | ||
| At3g53480 | Kim et al. ( | ||
| At1g04120 | Knoller and Murphy ( | ||
| At5g60790 | Salk_129048 | In this study | |
| At1g64550 | Salk_055035 | In this study | |
| At1g71330 | Salk_047823 | In this study | |
| At4g01660 | Salk_105250 | In this study |
List of primers used in this study for screening homozygous lines of ABC transporters T-DNA KO mutant lines.
| AGI code new systemic name | Mutant name | Primer pairs |
|---|---|---|
| At5g60790 | Salk_129048 | F: 5′-TGCTCGTCAAGCACAGAGTAA-3′ |
| R: 5′-CTGAGTCACCTTTCCAACGAA-3′ | ||
| At1g64550 | Salk_055035 | F: 5′-CCGGTTTTGAACTGAGAATTTG-3′ |
| R: 5′-CAAAAGAACATGCAACGATTTC-3′ | ||
| At1g71330 | Salk_047823 | F: 5′-CCAACTCAGAAGTTTTTGGC-3′ |
| R: 5′-CTTGACTTTCTTGTTTCCCGTC-3′ | ||
| At4g01660 | Salk_105250 | F: 5′-GCTCGTTTGCAATACATCAGAG-3′ |
| R: 5′-TGTTGAATCAGGTACGGTAACG-3′ |
.
List of primers used in this study for screening the expression of ABC transporter genes in T-DNA KO lines.
| AGI Code | New systemic name | Primer pairs |
|---|---|---|
| At1g59870 | F: 5′-AGAGCAGCGGCTATTGTGATGA-3′ | |
| R: 5′-TGGCGTAGACGATGAGTGAGAT-3′ | ||
| At3g53480 | F: 5′-TGAGGAGAGGTATAACAGGAGGTC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-GAGAGATTCAAAGAACGAGAGAGG-3′ | ||
| At1g04120 | F: 5′-CCTGCTCTTGGGTTTCTCTGCT-3′ | |
| R: 5′-ATGGTGGGCAGACACTAAGGCC-3′ | ||
| At5g60790 | F: 5′-CTGCGATTGGTAGGTTTGGT-3′ | |
| R: 5′-CTCTCAAGTGTGTGGCTTTA-3′ | ||
| At1g64550 | F: 5′-AAAGCATGGATTGGTGAAGC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-CAATTCGCATTCTCCATCCT-3′ | ||
| At1g71330 | F: 5′-TACATATTGCACGCGCTCTCTACC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-TTCACAGGAGCTTGCACATCCTCA-3′ | ||
| At4g01660 | F: 5′-ACGGTAACGGAAGCATCATCTC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-GTTGTTGGTTCGGAAAGCATAG-3′ |
.
List of primers used in this study for screening the expression of genes for RT-PCR assays.
| AGI Code | Gene | Primer pairs |
|---|---|---|
| At2g14610 | F: 5′-GTAGGTGCTCTTGTTCTTCCC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-CACATAATTCCCACGAGGATC-3′ | ||
| At3g57260 | F: 5′-CTACAGAGATGGTGTCA-3′ | |
| R: 5′-AGCTGAAGTAAGGGTAG-3′ | ||
| At1g75040 | F: 5′-CACATTCTCTTCCTCGTGTTC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-tAGTTAGCTCCGGTACAAGTG-3′ | ||
| At5g44420 | F: 5′-CACCCTTATCTTCGCTGCTC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-TGTTTGGCTCCTTCAAGGTT-3′ | ||
| At1g71330 | F: 5′-TACATATTGCACGCGCTCTCTACC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-TTCACAGGAGCTTGCACATCCTCA-3′ | ||
| At3g47730 | F: 5′-TCAAGTGGGTTTCCCTATGC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-CCCGGTATCCCGATAAATCT-3′ | ||
| At3g47780 | F: 5′-GGGAAACTTGAGAGGGGAAG-3′ | |
| R: 5′-CTTCAGCTCTTTTGGGTTGC-3′ | ||
| At4g01660 | F: 5′-ACGGTAACGGAAGCATCATCTC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-GTTGTTGGTTCGGAAAGCATAG-3′ | ||
| At5g39040 | F: 5′-ATGGAAGCGAGAATGGTTTG-3′ | |
| R: 5′-CTACTAGCGCCTGCAGCTTT′-3′ | ||
| At5g60790 | F: 5′-CTGCGATTGGTAGGTTTGGT-3′ | |
| R: 5′-CTCTCAAGTGTGTGGCTTTA-3′ | ||
| At1g64550 | F: 5′-AAAGCATGGATTGGTGAAGC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-CAATTCGCATTCTCCATCCT-3′ | ||
| At2g34660 | F: 5′-CCGCAGAAATCCTCTTGGTCTTGATG-3′ | |
| R: 5′-CCTTGTAAGTGGTGTGAGTCATCTTTGG-3′ | ||
| At1g04120 | F: 5′-CCTGCTCTTGGGTTTCTCTGCT-3′ | |
| R: 5′-ATGGTGGGCAGACACTAAGGCC-3′ | ||
| At2g36380 | F: 5′-AGATGTTGACGTCACGAATCTTGCT-3′ | |
| R: 5′-GTTGCCCTGCGTGAAAAGAATTG-3′ | ||
| At1g15210 | F: 5′-GGACATACACGCTTCCCACT-3′ | |
| R: 5′-AAGCACACTTGTTCCCAACC-3′ | ||
| At3g53480 | F: 5′-TGAGGAGAGGTATATCAGGAGGTC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-GAGAGATTCAAAGAACGAGAGAGG-3′ | ||
| At2g36910 | F: 5′-AGACCTGGAAGCGGCACATGC-3′ | |
| R: 5′-TAGAGTCGCGGCTTGTATGAT-3′ | ||
| At2g47000 | F: 5′-TTCATCAGTGGTCTGCAACAG-3′ | |
| R: 5′-TGAAGCTGAACTAACGAAGCA-3′ |
.
Figure 1Phenotypic characterization of ABC transporter T-DNA KO mutants used in this study. (A) Organ-specific expression of ABC transporters in wild type roots, leaves, and flowers. (B) RT-PCR assays of the ABC transporter mutants used in this study. (C) Characterization of root phenotype by growing wild type and mutants in MS agar medium supplemented with 0.5 and 1% sucrose. Number of lateral roots was measured when the seedlings were 14 days old. (D) Characterization of root phenotype by growing wild type and mutants in MS agar medium supplemented with 0.5 and 1% sucrose. Root length was measured when the seedlings were 14 days old. cDNA was prepared from respective tissues. Total RNA and RT-PCR was performed using gene-specific primers. The lower panel is the actin control for the cDNA of wild type root, leaf, and flower. R, root; L, leaf; F, flower. The results represent experiments repeated two times with three replicates each.
Figure 2Bray–Curtis ordination analyses with Sorenson distance of the root exudates of wild type and ABC transporter mutants constructed from HPLC-MS data obtained from root exudates profiles.
Multi-response permutation procedure (MRPP) analysis of the root exudates and root tissue profiles of the wild type and mutants analyzed by GC-MS and HPLC-MS methods.
| Statistic | GC-MS exudates | HPLC-MS exudates | HPLC-MS tissues |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test statistic ( | −12.044 | −12.562 | −11.834 |
| Observed delta | 0.194 | 0.192 | 0.095 |
| Expected delta | 0.256 | 0.248 | 0.192 |
| Variance of delta | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Skewness of delta | −0.440 | −0.481 | −0.513 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Pairwise comparisons of the root exudates and root tissue profiles of the wild type and mutants analyzed by GC-MS and HPLC-MS methods.
| Comparison | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutant 1 | Mutant 2 | GC-MS exudates | HPLC-MS exudates | HPLC-MS tissues |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.084 | ||
| 0.001 | 0.052 | 0.006 | ||
| 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.006 | ||
| 0.003 | 0.013 | 0.006 | ||
| 0.002 | 0.066 | 0.007 | ||
| 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.010 | ||
| 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.009 | ||
| 0.001 | 0.058 | 0.008 | ||
| 0.001 | 0.040 | 0.006 | ||
| 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.006 | ||
| 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.010 | ||
| 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.007 | ||
| 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.009 | ||
| 0.003 | 0.011 | 0.020 | ||
| 0.002 | 0.025 | 0.007 | ||
| 0.001 | 0.095 | 0.141 | ||
| 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.068 | ||
| 0.082 | <0.001 | 0.012 | ||
| 0.145 | 0.009 | 0.006 | ||
| 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.007 | ||
| 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.007 | ||
| 0.021 | <0.001 | 0.010 | ||
| 0.010 | 0.132 | 0.006 | ||
| 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.006 | ||
| 0.020 | <0.001 | 0.010 | ||
| 0.030 | <0.001 | 0.088 | ||
| 0.162 | <0.001 | 0.009 | ||
| 0.322 | 0.466 | 0.009 | ||
Retention times and molecular masses of the compounds missing in the ABC transporter mutants compared with wild type after 3 days’ secretion (21-day-old plants) of root exudate profiles analyzed by HPLC-MS.
| Retention time (min), molecular mass | Col-0 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.8, 277 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| 35.58, 176 | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + |
| 39.3, 224 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| 40.0, 200 | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + |
+, indicate presence of compound; −, indicate the absence of compound.
Figure A1Root exudates profile of 21-day-old wild type (Col-0) and ABC transporter mutant plants analyzed by HPLC-MS at wavelength 280 nm. Arrows indicate the peaks present or absent in respective mutants. The numbers indicate the positive ESIMS of the peaks. The chromatogram represent experiments repeated two times with three replicates each.
Figure 3Bray–Curtis ordination analyses with Sorenson distance of the root exudates of wild type and ABC transporter mutants constructed from GC-MS data obtained from root exudates profiles.
Figure A2Graphs illustrating the representative phenolic compounds that show different levels in the ABC transporter mutants compared to wild type analyzed by GC-MS. *Indicates the values are statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with wild-type (Col-0) line (n = 8).
Figure A3Graphs illustrating the representative sugars that show different levels in the ABC transporter mutants compared to wild type analyzed by GC-MS. *Indicates the values are statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with wild-type (Col-0) line (n = 8).
Figure 4Bray–Curtis ordination analyses with Sorenson distance of the root tissue metabolites of wild type and ABC transporter mutants constructed from HPLC-MS data obtained from root tissue metabolites profiles.
Retention times of the compounds of the root tissue profiles of 21-day-old wild type and ABC transporter mutants analyzed by HPLC-MS.
| RT | Col-0 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.42 | 132.3 (8.9) | 145.5 (4.9) | 105.1 (6.7) | 94.3 (7.6) | 135.7 (15.2) | |||
| 14.91 | 4.9 (0.2) | 10.3 (0.5) | 5.7 (0.1) | 6.4 (0.5) | 7.5 (0.7) | |||
| 19.0 | 11.0 (1.3) | 18.4 (0.7) | 20.5 (1.9) | 18.5 (1.5) | ||||
| 20.36 | 16.9 (1.1) | 23.5 (0.8) | 28.5 (3.0) | 20.1 (1.2) | ||||
| 23.0 | 6.5 (1.7) | 9.7 (0.5) | 3.6 (0.5) | 8.4 (2.0) | 3.1 (0.8) | 10.5 (0.7) | 17.5 (1.3) | 2.5 (0.3) |
| 24.33 | 20.7 (1.7) | 28.1 (0.7) | 25.9 (1.4) | 23.3 (0.6) | 24.2 (1.8) | 33.4 (2.6) | ||
| 25.58 | 26.1 (2.9) | 27.8 (0.7) | 21.4 (1.5) | 21.6 (1.3) | 16.8 (1.2) | 22.6 (0.8) | ||
| 27.11 | 18.1 (1.5) | 23.1 (0.5) | 35.4 (2.6) | 11.0 (1.0) | 29.5 (1.7) | |||
| 29.0 | 29.1 (2.6) | 39.7 (1.0) | 39.8 (1.3) | 49.1 (3.1) | 28.1 (1.1) | 41.1 (2.3) | 37.0 (2.6) | |
| 30.59 | 17.3 (1.5) | 22.1 (0.4) | 14.7 (0.7) | 19.3 (1.2) | 10.8 (0.3) | 15.3 (0.9) | 18.1 (0.6) | 12.4 (0.8) |
| 31.38 | 18.8 (4.6) | 10.0 (0.4) | 37.7 (0.7) | 36.1 (1.1) | 12.2 (0.7) | 17.9 (1.9) | 10.9 (0.7) | |
| 34.86 | 17.3 (2.0) | 17.2 (1.7) | 16.7 (0.6) | 16.5 (1.4) | ||||
| 36.6 | 2.4 (0.0) | 3.9 (0.5) | 2.9 (0.2) | 4.55 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.3) | |||
| 37.32 | 48.0 (4.6) | 59.3 (2.9) | 33.5 (1.5) | 65.1 (4.8) | 59.2 (1.5) | 32.6 (2.0) | ||
| 40.49 | 7.6 (1.3) | 11.2 (1.8) | 6.5 (1.2) | 4.8 (0.7) | 14.2 (1.1) | 7.9 (0.8) | 9.7 (1.6) | |
| 49.31 | 6.7 (0.8) | 10.4 (1.3) | 7.8 (0.7) | 4.7 (0.4) | 9.4 (1.2) | |||
| 51.24 | 10.2 (1.4) | 15.9 (2.3) | 8.1 (0.7) | 14.2 (1.8) | 6.5 (0.6) | 8.4 (0.9) | 13.6 (1.1) |
Values represented are peak areas of the corresponding compounds in the wild type and mutants. The values in bold are statistically significant when compared to the wild type at .
Figure 5Total salicylic acid concentrations of the root tissues of wild type and . *Indicates the values are significant at p-value below 0.05 compared to wild type. Values represented are the mean of three biological replicates.
Figure 6Gene expression analyses of wild type (Wt) and . (A) RT-PCR assay of defense genes expressions in wild type and Atabcg36 root tissues. (B) RT-PCR assay of ABC transporters gene expressions in wild type and Atabcg36 root tissues. *Indicates the gene expression of AtABCB1 is higher in Atabcg36 compared to wild type. The results represent experiments repeated two times with three replicates each.
Figure A4Mass trace of compound camalexin (positive ESIMS 201) in the root exudates of wild type (Wt) and ABC transporter mutants used in this study overlayed with authentic camalexin.