UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to compare 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1A (5-HT(1A)) PET with cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglc) PET for temporal lobectomy planning. METHODS: We estimated 5-HT(1A) receptor binding preoperatively with (18)F-trans-4-fluoro-N-2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl) piperazin-1-yl]ethyl-N-(2-pyridyl) cyclohexane carboxamide ((18)F-FCWAY) PET and CMRglc measurement with (18)F-FDG in regions drawn on coregistered MRI after partial-volume correction in 41 patients who had anterior temporal lobectomy with at least a 1-y follow-up. Surgery was tailored to individual preresection evaluations and intraoperative electrocorticography. Mean regional asymmetry values and the number of regions with asymmetry exceeding 2 SDs in 16 healthy volunteers were compared between seizure-free and non-seizure-free patients. (18)F-FCWAY but not (18)F-FDG and MRI data were masked for surgical decisions and outcome assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 41 (63%) patients seizure-free since surgery had significantly different mesial temporal asymmetries, compared with 15 non-seizure-free patients for both (18)F-FCWAY (F(1,39) = 5.87; P = 0.02) and (18)F-FDG PET (F(1,38) = 5.79; P = 0.021). The probability of being seizure-free was explained by both (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FCWAY PET, but not MRI, with a significant additional (18)F-FCWAY effect (chi(2)(2) = 9.8796; P = 0.0072) after the probability of being seizure-free was explained by (18)F-FDG. Although MRI alone was not predictive, any combination of 2 lateralizing imaging studies was highly predictive of seizure freedom. CONCLUSION: Our study provides class III evidence that both 5-HT(1A) receptor PET and CMRglc PET can contribute to temporal lobectomy planning. Additional studies should explore the potential for temporal lobectomy based on interictal electroencephalography and minimally invasive imaging studies.
UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to compare 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1A (5-HT(1A)) PET with cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglc) PET for temporal lobectomy planning. METHODS: We estimated 5-HT(1A) receptor binding preoperatively with (18)F-trans-4-fluoro-N-2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl) piperazin-1-yl]ethyl-N-(2-pyridyl) cyclohexane carboxamide ((18)F-FCWAY) PET and CMRglc measurement with (18)F-FDG in regions drawn on coregistered MRI after partial-volume correction in 41 patients who had anterior temporal lobectomy with at least a 1-y follow-up. Surgery was tailored to individual preresection evaluations and intraoperative electrocorticography. Mean regional asymmetry values and the number of regions with asymmetry exceeding 2 SDs in 16 healthy volunteers were compared between seizure-free and non-seizure-free patients. (18)F-FCWAY but not (18)F-FDG and MRI data were masked for surgical decisions and outcome assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 41 (63%) patientsseizure-free since surgery had significantly different mesial temporal asymmetries, compared with 15 non-seizure-free patients for both (18)F-FCWAY (F(1,39) = 5.87; P = 0.02) and (18)F-FDG PET (F(1,38) = 5.79; P = 0.021). The probability of being seizure-free was explained by both (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FCWAY PET, but not MRI, with a significant additional (18)F-FCWAY effect (chi(2)(2) = 9.8796; P = 0.0072) after the probability of being seizure-free was explained by (18)F-FDG. Although MRI alone was not predictive, any combination of 2 lateralizing imaging studies was highly predictive of seizure freedom. CONCLUSION: Our study provides class III evidence that both 5-HT(1A) receptor PET and CMRglc PET can contribute to temporal lobectomy planning. Additional studies should explore the potential for temporal lobectomy based on interictal electroencephalography and minimally invasive imaging studies.
Authors: M T Toczek; R E Carson; L Lang; Y Ma; M V Spanaki; M G Der; S Fazilat; L Kopylev; P Herscovitch; W C Eckelman; W H Theodore Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-03-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: R P Carne; T J O'Brien; C J Kilpatrick; L R MacGregor; R J Hicks; M A Murphy; S C Bowden; A H Kaye; M J Cook Journal: Brain Date: 2004-07-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Anne M McIntosh; Renate M Kalnins; L Anne Mitchell; Gavin C A Fabinyi; Regula S Briellmann; Samuel F Berkovic Journal: Brain Date: 2004-06-23 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Siobhan West; Sarah J Nevitt; Jennifer Cotton; Sacha Gandhi; Jennifer Weston; Ajay Sudan; Roberto Ramirez; Richard Newton Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-06-25
Authors: Jogeshwar Mukherjee; Alisha K Bajwa; Dustin W Wooten; Ansel T Hillmer; Min-Liang Pan; Suresh K Pandey; Neil Saigal; Bradley T Christian Journal: J Comp Neurol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 3.215
Authors: Dubravka Svob Strac; Nela Pivac; Ilse J Smolders; Wieslawa A Fogel; Philippe De Deurwaerdere; Giuseppe Di Giovanni Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 4.677