OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphology-based criteria for the ultrasonic assessment of axillary lymph node in primary breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 2256 T0-2N0 patients underwent axillary ultrasound preoperatively. Lymph nodes were classified as normal if no node was found or cortex thickness was even and < 3 mm; abnormal, (1) if cortex thickness was even but ≥ 3 mm or (2) focally thickened cortex ≥ 3 mm or (3) fatty hilum was absent. The patients in the abnormal group underwent ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA). Except for positive lymph nodes, all the others underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). RESULTS: In this series, 692 (30.7%) were pathologically confirmed positive LNs. Among them, 214 (9.5%) were identified by US-FNA. And 361 were abnormal according to the above mentioned criteria. The proportions were 11.6%, 54.8% and 33.5% in Group 1-3 respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of these criteria alone were 35.8%, 92.8%, 68.7% and 76.6% respectively. CONCLUSION: The present morphology-based criteria for the ultrasonic assessment of lymph node status is both effective and practical in primary breast cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphology-based criteria for the ultrasonic assessment of axillary lymph node in primary breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 2256 T0-2N0 patients underwent axillary ultrasound preoperatively. Lymph nodes were classified as normal if no node was found or cortex thickness was even and < 3 mm; abnormal, (1) if cortex thickness was even but ≥ 3 mm or (2) focally thickened cortex ≥ 3 mm or (3) fatty hilum was absent. The patients in the abnormal group underwent ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA). Except for positive lymph nodes, all the others underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). RESULTS: In this series, 692 (30.7%) were pathologically confirmed positive LNs. Among them, 214 (9.5%) were identified by US-FNA. And 361 were abnormal according to the above mentioned criteria. The proportions were 11.6%, 54.8% and 33.5% in Group 1-3 respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of these criteria alone were 35.8%, 92.8%, 68.7% and 76.6% respectively. CONCLUSION: The present morphology-based criteria for the ultrasonic assessment of lymph node status is both effective and practical in primary breast cancer.