Literature DB >> 22779776

The adverse event profile of lacosamide: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Gaetano Zaccara1, Piero Perucca, Giulia Loiacono, Fabio Giovannelli, Alberto Verrotti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Defining the tolerability and safety profile of recently marketed antiepileptic drugs, such as lacosamide (LCM), is a prerequisite for their optimal utilization in clinical practice. We aimed to identify any adverse event (AE) associated with LCM treatment by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We also evaluated the association of serious AEs with LCM, the proportion of study withdrawals due to intolerable AEs at different LCM doses, and whether the tolerability profile of LCM differs according to the disorder in which it was investigated.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL to May 2011 for LCM RCTs. Additional studies were identified from reference lists of retrieved papers and from online clinical databases. We selected placebo-controlled, double-blind RCTs and investigated the therapeutic effects of oral LCM in adults with any condition. AEs were assessed for their association with LCM after identification/exclusion of synonyms, rare AEs, and non-assessable AEs. We used risk differences to evaluate the association of any (99% confidence intervals [CIs]) or serious AEs (95% CIs) with LCM and to investigate dose-response relationships of identified AEs. KEY
FINDINGS: Ten RCTs (three in pharmacoresistant epilepsy, four in neuropathic pain, one in migraine, one in fibromyalgia, and one in knee osteoarthritis) were included in our study. Their duration varied from 12-18 weeks. The total number of patients included was 3,148. No serious AE was significantly associated with LCM treatment. Of 21 identified AEs, 11 (52%) were found to be significantly associated with LCM. The number of AEs significantly associated with LCM increased with increasing dose: one at 200 mg/day (dizziness); six at 400 mg/day (dizziness, vertigo, abnormal coordination, abnormal vision, nausea, and vomiting); nine at 600 mg/day (dizziness, vertigo, ataxia, balance disorder, diplopia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and tremor). The proportion of AE-related study withdrawals also significantly increased with increasing dose. LCM AEs tended to occur more frequently in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy compared with patients with other disorders. SIGNIFICANCE: A range of AEs suggestive of vestibulocerebellar dysfunction is significantly associated with LCM treatment and their incidence increases with increasing doses. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2012 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22779776     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03589.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  16 in total

1.  Safe Treatment of Seizures in the Setting of HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  Omar Siddiqi; Gretchen L Birbeck
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Lacosamide in Norway: Focus on Pharmacokinetic Variability, Efficacy and Tolerability.

Authors:  Torleiv Svendsen; Eylert Brodtkorb; Arton Baftiu; Margrete Larsen Burns; Svein I Johannessen; Cecilie Johannessen Landmark
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  Characterization of the adverse events profile of placebo-treated patients in randomized controlled trials on drug-resistant focal epilepsies.

Authors:  Fabio Giovannelli; Gaetano Zaccara; Massimo Cincotta; Giulia Loiacono; Alberto Verrotti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Network meta-analyses of antiepileptic drug efficacy and tolerability in drug-resistant focal epilepsies: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Gaetano Zaccara; Fabio Giovannelli; Gail S Bell; Josemir W Sander
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaetano Zaccara; Fabio Giovannelli; Filippo Sean Giorgi; Valentina Franco; Sara Gasparini; Umberto Benedetto
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  The efficacy of lacosamide as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in focal epilepsy and its use in status epilepticus: clinical trial evidence and experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Bauer; Laurent M Willems; Esther Paule; Christine Petschow; Johann Philipp Zöllner; Felix Rosenow; Adam Strzelczyk
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 6.570

7.  Sodium channel slow inactivation as a therapeutic target for myotonia congenita.

Authors:  Kevin R Novak; Jennifer Norman; Jacob R Mitchell; Martin J Pinter; Mark M Rich
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 8.  The long-term safety of antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  Athanasios Gaitatzis; Josemir W Sander
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 9.  Practical Use of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs as Adjunctive Therapy in Focal Epilepsy.

Authors:  Martin J Brodie
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  Development of lacosamide for the treatment of partial-onset seizures.

Authors:  Pamela Doty; David Hebert; Francois-Xavier Mathy; William Byrnes; James Zackheim; Kelly Simontacchi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.