Literature DB >> 2277876

The marriage of clinical trials and clinical decision science.

J Hilden1, J D Habbema.   

Abstract

Clinical decision science is concerned with rational clinical decisions. All branches of medical research contribute here, but controlled clinical trials of the pragmatic variety carry a particular responsibility. Usually, however, they are not conducted and reported so that they can be used directly as input to a decision analysis. We suggest that the forces of the two methodologies should be united, and point out some areas where this 'marriage' will have a non-trivial impact: choice of end points, style of outcome recording, adaptive designs, and style of result presentation. Special attention is given to the decision-analytic setting of research priorities, the role of utility calculus in quantifying the ethical dilemmas that surround clinical trials, and the use of patient attitude towards outcomes of treatment as a covariate in its own right.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2277876     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780091105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  Bayesian communication: a clinically significant paradigm for electronic publication.

Authors:  H P Lehmann; S N Goodman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Some popular versions of uninformed consent.

Authors:  J L Hutton; R E Ashcroft
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Premature stopping and informed consent in AMI trials.

Authors:  J Hilden; A Gammelgaard
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.