| Literature DB >> 22778637 |
David Sánchez Montero1, Pedro Contreras Lallana, Carmen Vázquez.
Abstract
A low-cost intensity-based polymer optical fiber (POF) sensor for fuel level measurements in paramotoring and powered paragliding is presented, exploiting the advantages of the optical fiber sensing technology. Experimental results demonstrate that the best option can be performed by stripping the fiber at the desired discrete points to measure the fuel level as well as with a gauge-shape fiber bending. The prototype has a good linearity, better than 4% full scale (F.S.), and sensitivity around 0.5 V per bend are obtained. Hysteresis due to residual fluid at the sensing points is found to be less than 9% F.S.Entities:
Keywords: fiber-optic sensor; intensity-based optical sensor; polymer optical fiber (POF)
Year: 2012 PMID: 22778637 PMCID: PMC3386736 DOI: 10.3390/s120506186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Real application scenario.
Paramotoring classification and basic features.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-end | <23 | <100 | 15/9,200 | 70 | 90 | 5 L |
| Mid-range | 25 | 125 | 22/10,000 | 120 | 115 | 9–13.5 L |
| High-end | >26 | >130 | 29/10,000 | 200 | 125 | 13.5 L |
Figure 2.(a) Block diagram of the fuel level measuring system; (b) Photograph of a gauge-shaped POF-based fiber-optic sensor prototype for fuel level measurements; (c) Block diagram of the twist-shape POF fiber-optic sensor prototype.
Figure 3.Relative optical power detected for different fluids and sensing probes as a function of the level of fluid. (a) Non-bended fiber sensing prototype; (b) Gauge-shaped fiber sensing prototype; (c) Twist-shaped fiber sensing prototype.
Figure 4.Optical power detected at reception versus fuel level for different sensing probes at 650 nm. (a) Non-bended fiber sensing prototype; (b) Gauge-shaped fiber sensing prototype; (c) Twist-shape fiber sensing prototype.
Statistics of the experimental data in fuel level measurements at 650 nm.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.9981 | −0.07 dB/level | ±0.05 dBm | −18.8 dBm | <11% F.S. | |
| 0.9928 | −0.22 dB/level | ±0.13 dBm | −30.6 dBm | <8% F.S. | |
| 0.998 | −0.47 dB/level | ±0.38 dBm | −50.1 dBm | <9% F.S. | |
Given by the linear regression coefficient, fuel level full-scale (F.S.);
Maximum standard deviation in measurements, fuel level full-scale (F.S.);
Measured at half-capacity, i.e., 3 L.
Figure 5.Optical power detected at reception versus fuel level for a gauge-shaped fiber sensing probe operating at 850 nm.
Statistics of the experimental data in fuel level measurement for gauge-shaped fiber sensing probe at 650 nm and 850 nm, respectively.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linearity | Sensitivity | σ | Averaged optical power received | Hysteresis | |
| 0.9928 | −0.22 dB/level | ±0.13 dBm | −30.6 dBm | <8% F.S. | |
| 0.9751 | −0.29 dB/level | ±0.19 dBm | −34.5 dBm | <9% F.S. | |
Given by the linear regression coefficient, fuel level full-scale (F.S.);
Maximum standard deviation in measurements, fuel level full-scale (F.S.);
Measured at half-capacity, i.e., 3 L.
Volume of fuel (in L), V(L), and corresponding heights (in cm), H(cm), inside the tank. Decision criteria (threshold voltage) implemented at the control electronics unit.
| 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | > 6.0 | |
| 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 10.4 | |
| Vx > 4.1V | 4.1 > Vx > 3.5 | 3.5 > Vx > 3.1 | 3.1 > Vx > 2.7 | 2.7 > Vx > 2.2 | 2.2 > Vx | |
| FL=Fuel Level (L) | FL = 0 | 0.5 > FL > 0 | 1.0 > FL > 0.5 | 1.5 > FL > 1.0 | 2.0 > FL > 1.5 | FL > 6 |
Figure 6.Calibration curve of the sensor prototype versus fuel level. Linear regression of the output voltage from the signal conditioning stage is represented in solid line.