| Literature DB >> 22778595 |
Yuan Ruan1, Weimin Yu, Fan Cheng, Xiaobin Zhang, Stéphane Larré.
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) are a new class of fluorescent labeling for biological and biomedical applications. In this study, we detected prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) expression correlated with tumor grade and stage in human prostate cancer by QDs-based immunolabeling and conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC), and evaluated the sensitivity and stability of QDs-based immunolabeling in comparison with IHC. Our data revealed that increasing levels of PSCA expression accompanied advanced tumor grade (QDs labeling, r = 0.732, p < 0.001; IHC, r = 0.683, p < 0.001) and stage (QDs labeling, r = 0.514, p = 0.001; IHC, r = 0.432, p = 0.005), and the similar tendency was detected by the two methods. In addition, by comparison between the two methods, QDs labeling was consistent with IHC in detecting the expression of PSCA in human prostate tissue correlated with different pathological types (K = 0.845, p < 0.001). During the observation time, QDs exhibited superior stability. The intensity of QDs fluorescence remained stable for two weeks (p = 0.083) after conjugation to the PSCA protein, and nearly 93% of positive expression with their fluorescence still could be seen after four weeks.Entities:
Keywords: fluorescence; prostate cancer; prostate stem cell antigen; quantum dots
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22778595 PMCID: PMC3386694 DOI: 10.3390/s120505461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Associativity analysis of PSCA expression levels and Gleason score in PCa by two methods.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |||
| 0 | 18 | 1 | 19 | |||
| 1 | 3 | 13 | 17 | |||
| 4 | 22 | 14 | 40 | |||
|
| ||||||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |||
| 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |||
| 0 | 17 | 2 | 19 | |||
| 1 | 3 | 12 | 16 | |||
| 4 | 22 | 14 | 40 | |||
Associativity analysis of PSCA expression levels and tumor stage in PCa by two methods.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |||
| 3 | 16 | 0 | 19 | |||
| 2 | 10 | 5 | 17 | |||
| 9 | 26 | 5 | 40 | |||
|
| ||||||
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |||
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |||
| 3 | 15 | 1 | 19 | |||
| 2 | 10 | 4 | 16 | |||
| 9 | 26 | 5 | 40 | |||
Figure 1.The levels of PSCA expression by QDs labeling and IHC. Under excitation of blue light, (A–C) show the positive expression of QDs-IHC at 3+, 2+, and 1+ and (D) was the negative control. (E–G) are the positive expression of IHC at 3+, 2+, and 1+ and (H) was the negative control. (All magnifications: 200×).
Consistency analysis of QDs labeling and IHC technology for detecting the different levels of PSCA expression in various prostate tissues.
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 24 | K = 0.845 | ||
| 0 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 11 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 27 | 1 | 28 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 | |||
| 19 | 13 | 30 | 18 | 80 | |||
Figure 2.Observation of fluorescence durability on QDs labeling. (A–E) show the intensity of QDs fluorescence, under excitation of blue light, in the same vision at 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after conjugation to the PSCA protein. (All magnifications: 200×)
Figure 3.The distribution of different QDs fluorescent scales by time-varying.