Literature DB >> 22778019

Induction gemcitabine and oxaliplatin therapy followed by a twice-weekly infusion of gemcitabine and concurrent external-beam radiation for neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single institutional experience.

Francesco Leone1, Marco Gatti, Paolo Massucco, Federica Colombi, Elisa Sperti, Delia Campanella, Daniele Regge, Pietro Gabriele, Lorenzo Capussotti, Massimo Aglietta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may render curative resection feasible in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). The authors previously demonstrated the achievement of significant disease control and a median survival of 14 months by CRT in patients with LAPC. In this study, they evaluated the use of induction chemotherapy followed by a CRT neoadjuvant protocol.
METHODS: Patients first received induction gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2)). Patients without disease progression then received gemcitabine twice weekly (50 mg/m(2) daily) concurrent with radiotherapy (50.4 grays) and were re-evaluated for resectability.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (15 with borderline resectable disease and 24 with unresectable disease) entered the study. The treatment was well tolerated. Disease control was obtained in 29 of 39 patients. Two patients progressed after GEMOX, and 7 progressed after CRT. After a median follow-up of 13 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months. The median PFS of patients with borderline resectable and unresectable disease was 16.6 and 9.1 months, respectively (P = .056). For the whole group, the median overall survival (OS) was 16.7 months (27.8 months for patients with borderline resectable disease, 13.3 for patients with unresectable disease; P = .045). Eleven patients (9 with borderline resectable disease and 2 with unresectable disease at diagnosis) underwent successful resection. Patients who underwent resection had a significantly longer median PFS compared with nonresected patients (19.7 months vs 7.6 months, respectively). The median OS among resected and nonresected patients was 31.5 months and 12.3 months, respectively (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that induction GEMOX followed by CRT is feasible in patients with LAPC. Both those with borderline resectable disease and those with unresectable disease received clinical benefit, a chance to obtain resectability, and improved survival. The authors concluded that this protocol warrants further evaluation.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22778019     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  32 in total

Review 1.  The role of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a review.

Authors:  Suzanne Russo; John Ammori; Jennifer Eads; Jennifer Dorth
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 2.  Advances in chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Bhawna Sirohi; Ashish Singh; Shaheenah Dawood; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-13

Review 3.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: need for standardization and methods for optimal clinical trial design.

Authors:  Matthew H G Katz; Robert Marsh; Joseph M Herman; Qian Shi; Eric Collison; Alan P Venook; Hedy L Kindler; Steven R Alberts; Philip Philip; Andrew M Lowy; Peter W T Pisters; Mitchell C Posner; Jordan D Berlin; Syed A Ahmad
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Individualized radiotherapy (iRT) concepts for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): indications and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  FOLFIRINOX Induction Therapy for Stage 3 Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Eran Sadot; Alexandre Doussot; Eileen M O'Reilly; Maeve A Lowery; Karyn A Goodman; Richard Kinh Gian Do; Laura H Tang; Mithat Gönen; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: an ongoing debate.

Authors:  Suzanne Russo; M Wasif Saif
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 7.  Resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: what does it matter?

Authors:  Daniel M Halperin; Gauri R Varadhachary
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Phase 2 trial of induction gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and cetuximab followed by selective capecitabine-based chemoradiation in patients with borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Nestor F Esnaola; Uzair B Chaudhary; Paul O'Brien; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; E Ramsay Camp; Melanie B Thomas; David J Cole; Alberto J Montero; Brenda J Hoffman; Joseph Romagnuolo; Kelly P Orwat; David T Marshall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Accelerated fraction radiotherapy with capecitabine as neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Samhita Chakraborty; Monica M Morris; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Edward B Stelow; Gina Petroni; Hanna K Sanoff
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01

10.  Role of neoadjuvant therapy in the management of pancreatic cancer: is the era of biomarker-directed therapy here?

Authors:  E V Tsvetkova; T R Asmis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.