Literature DB >> 22778001

Assessing large spatial scale landscape change effects on water quality and quantity response in the lower Athabasca River basin.

Nicole E Seitz1, Cherie J Westbrook, Monique G Dubé, Allison J Squires.   

Abstract

Increased land use intensity has been shown to adversely affect aquatic ecosystems. Multiple landscape stressors interact over space and time, producing cumulative effects. Cumulative Effects Assessment (CEA) is the process of evaluating the impact a development project may have on the ecological surroundings, but several challenges exist that make current approaches to cumulative effects assessment ineffective. The main objective of this study was to compare results of different methods used to link landscape stressors with stream responses in a highly developed watershed, where past work has shown that the river has experienced significant water quality and quantity changes to improve approaches to CEA. The study site was the lower reaches of the Athabasca River, Canada that have been subjected to a diverse range of intense anthropogenic developments since the late 1960s. Linkages between landscape change and river response were evaluated using correlation analyses, stepwise, multiple regression, and regression trees. Notable landscape changes include increased industrial development and forest cut-blocks, made evident from satellite imagery and supporting ancillary data sets. Simple regression analyses showed water use was closely associated with total phosphorus (TP) and Na(+) concentrations, as well as specific conductance. The regression trees for total organic carbon (TOC), TP, and Na(+) showed that the landscape variables that appear as the first characteristic were the same variables that showed significant relations for their respective simple regression models. Simple, stepwise, and multiple regressions in conjunction with regression trees were useful in this study for capturing the strongest associations between landscape stressors and river response variables. The results highlight the need for improved scaling methods and monitoring strategies crucial to managing cumulative effects to river systems.
Copyright © 2012 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cumulative effects assessment; Framework; Regression trees; Stream monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22778001     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  3 in total

1.  Capacity for watershed cumulative effects assessment and management: lessons from the Lower Fraser River Basin, Canada.

Authors:  Stephanie Kristensen; Bram F Noble; Robert J Patrick
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  A critical review of the ecological status of lakes and rivers from Canada's oil sands region.

Authors:  Tim J Arciszewski; Roderick R O Hazewinkel; Monique G Dubé
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Accelerated seed dispersal along linear disturbances in the Canadian oil sands region.

Authors:  David Roberts; Simone Ciuti; Quinn E Barber; Caitlin Willier; Scott E Nielsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.