Literature DB >> 22777798

Eroding the boundaries of cognition: implications of embodiment(1).

Michael L Anderson1, Michael J Richardson, Anthony Chemero.   

Abstract

To accept that cognition is embodied is to question many of the beliefs traditionally held by cognitive scientists. One key question regards the localization of cognitive faculties. Here we argue that for cognition to be embodied and sometimes embedded, means that the cognitive faculty cannot be localized in a brain area alone. We review recent research on neural reuse, the 1/f structure of human activity, tool use, group cognition, and social coordination dynamics that we believe demonstrates how the boundary between the different areas of the brain, the brain and body, and the body and environment is not only blurred but indeterminate. In turn, we propose that cognition is supported by a nested structure of task-specific synergies, which are softly assembled from a variety of neural, bodily, and environmental components (including other individuals), and exhibit interaction dominant dynamics.
Copyright © 2012 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22777798     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01211.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  29 in total

1.  Object ownership and action: the influence of social context and choice on the physical manipulation of personal property.

Authors:  Merryn D Constable; Ada Kritikos; Ottmar V Lipp; Andrew P Bayliss
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Can discrete joint action be synergistic? Studying the stabilization of interpersonal hand coordination.

Authors:  Veronica Romero; Rachel Kallen; Michael A Riley; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Farey Trees Explain Sequential Effects in Choice Response Time.

Authors:  Colin T Annand; Sheila M Fleming; John G Holden
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  What does the interactive brain hypothesis mean for social neuroscience? A dialogue.

Authors:  Hanne De Jaegher; Ezequiel Di Paolo; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Beyond the tripartite cognition-emotion-interoception model of the human insular cortex.

Authors:  Lucina Q Uddin; Joshua Kinnison; Luiz Pessoa; Michael L Anderson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Experts in action: why we need an embodied social brain hypothesis.

Authors:  Louise Barrett; S Peter Henzi; Robert A Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The neurobiology of imagination: possible role of interaction-dominant dynamics and default mode network.

Authors:  Luigi F Agnati; Diego Guidolin; L Battistin; G Pagnoni; K Fuxe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-24

8.  Placebo From an Enactive Perspective.

Authors:  Iñigo R Arandia; Ezequiel A Di Paolo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-02

9.  The many faces of precision (Replies to commentaries on "Whatever next? Neural prediction, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science").

Authors:  Andy Clark
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-21

10.  Predicting individual differences in decision-making process from signature movement styles: an illustrative study of leaders.

Authors:  Brenda L Connors; Richard Rende; Timothy J Colton
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.