OBJECTIVES: Multi-station contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is considered as the imaging investigation of first choice in patients suffering from peripheral arterial occlusive disease. In order to overcome venous overlay and to gain dynamic flow information as provided by digital subtraction angiography (DSA), we developed a triple injection protocol for high-resolution MRA of the entire peripheral vascular system, applying time-resolved (TR) four-dimensional (4D) MRA sequences. METHODS: Ten patients underwent three-station TR-MRA of the pelvis and lower extremities with DSA as reference standard. Both investigations were compared concerning stenosis on a segment-by-segment basis. Furthermore, 28 consecutive patients underwent the same MR-only imaging protocol. All images were evaluated concerning image quality (1 = non-diagnostic, 4 = excellent), venous overlay (from none up to substantial) and time to venous enhancement (very early/early/normal/late). RESULTS: Three-station TR-MRA proved feasible and was comparable with DSA in 282 vessel segments, with underestimation grade of stenosis in four segments and overestimation in four segments, respectively. In 32/38 patients no venous overlay was noted; in six patients there was mild venous overlay. Image quality was rated excellent or good in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: TR-MRA provides morphological and functional information without any timing issues due to optimal arterial enhancement at high spatial resolution without venous overlay.
OBJECTIVES: Multi-station contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is considered as the imaging investigation of first choice in patients suffering from peripheral arterial occlusive disease. In order to overcome venous overlay and to gain dynamic flow information as provided by digital subtraction angiography (DSA), we developed a triple injection protocol for high-resolution MRA of the entire peripheral vascular system, applying time-resolved (TR) four-dimensional (4D) MRA sequences. METHODS: Ten patients underwent three-station TR-MRA of the pelvis and lower extremities with DSA as reference standard. Both investigations were compared concerning stenosis on a segment-by-segment basis. Furthermore, 28 consecutive patients underwent the same MR-only imaging protocol. All images were evaluated concerning image quality (1 = non-diagnostic, 4 = excellent), venous overlay (from none up to substantial) and time to venous enhancement (very early/early/normal/late). RESULTS: Three-station TR-MRA proved feasible and was comparable with DSA in 282 vessel segments, with underestimation grade of stenosis in four segments and overestimation in four segments, respectively. In 32/38 patients no venous overlay was noted; in six patients there was mild venous overlay. Image quality was rated excellent or good in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: TR-MRA provides morphological and functional information without any timing issues due to optimal arterial enhancement at high spatial resolution without venous overlay.
Authors: Florian M Vogt; Waleed Ajaj; Peter Hunold; Christoph U Herborn; Harald H Quick; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-10-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Peter Bannas; Anna Katharina Finck-Wedel; Jan-Hendrik Buhk; Thorsten Alexander Bley; Andreas Koops; Hendrik Kooijman; Frank-Ulrich Beil; Gerhard Adam; Christoph Weber Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Frank Berg; Christopher Bangard; Henning Bovenschulte; Martin Hellmich; Marco Nijenhuis; Klaus Lackner; Axel Gossmann Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Carlos Escobar; Ignacio Blanes; Andres Ruiz; David Vinuesa; Manuel Montero; Melchor Rodríguez; Gloria Barbera; Luis Manzano Journal: Eur J Intern Med Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 4.487
Authors: Jana Merino; Adriana Planas; Roberto Elosua; Ana de Moner; Ana Gasol; Carmen Contreras; Francesc Vidal-Barraquer; Albert Clarà Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Zachary M Arthurs; Paul D Bishop; Lindsay E Feiten; Matthew J Eagleton; Daniel G Clair; Vikram S Kashyap Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Yi Wang; Catherine Z Chen; Shalini G Chabra; Priscilla A Winchester; Neil M Khilnani; Richard Watts; Harry L Bush; K Craig Kent; Martin R Prince Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 6.016