Literature DB >> 22777409

The evaluation of the relationship between the level of disclosure of cancer in terminally ill patients with cancer and the quality of terminal care in these patients and their families using the Support Team Assessment Schedule.

Nobuhisa Nakajima1, Yoshinobu Hata, Hideki Onishi, Mayumi Ishida.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the relationship between informing patients of cancer and the quality of terminal care.
METHODS: This was a study of 87 consecutive terminally ill cancer patients who died during the last 27-month period. Notification of cancer was classified into 4 groups (A, B, C, and D, respectively): "nondisclosure," "disclosure of cancer diagnosis," "disclosure of life threatening," and "disclosure of poor prognosis." We evaluated the quality of palliative care using Support Team Assessment Schedule-Japanese (STAS-J).
RESULTS: A, B, C, and D groups included 8, 22, 37, and 20 cases, respectively. Regarding physical symptoms, no marked difference was noted. Anxiety was significantly reduced, and the recognition of disease conditions and the level of communication were significantly higher in the groups that received specific information (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Informing patients of more specific information will increase the quality of terminal care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STAS (Support Team Assessment Schedule); cancer; clinical audit; disclosure of cancer; oncology; truth telling

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22777409     DOI: 10.1177/1049909112452466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  4 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic disclosure in cancer care: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Roshan Sutar; Pooja Chaudhary
Journal:  Palliat Care Soc Pract       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Naomi C A van der Velden; Maartje C Meijers; Paul K J Han; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Ellen M A Smets; Inge Henselmans
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-04-23

3.  Communication about Prognosis during Patient-Initiated Second Opinion Consultations in Advanced Cancer Care: An Observational Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  N C A van der Velden; M B A van der Kleij; V Lehmann; E M A Smets; J M L Stouthard; I Henselmans; M A Hillen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Body image transformation after breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in southern Thai women.

Authors:  Thanarpan Peerawong; Tharin Phenwan; Somrit Mahattanobon; Kandawsri Tulathamkij; Uraiwan Pattanasattayavong
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-02-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.